Rekrutmen Berbasis Kecerdasan Buatan: Analisis Bias Algoritmik dalam Perspektif Prinsip Keadilan Hukum Islam dan UU Ketenagakerjaan Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61722/jiem.v4i6.10610Keywords:
bias algoritmik, rekrutmen berbasis AI, hukum Islam, keadilan, Ketenagakerjaan IndonesiaAbstract
Penggunaan kecerdasan buatan (AI) dalam proses rekrutmen tenaga kerja telah berkembang pesat, namun di balik efisiensi yang ditawarkan, sistem ini terbukti menghasilkan bentuk diskriminasi baru yang tersembunyi di balik opasitas algoritma, dikenal sebagai bias algoritmik. Artikel ini bertujuan menganalisis fenomena bias algoritmik dalam rekrutmen berbasis AI melalui perspektif komparatif antara prinsip keadilan hukum Islam dan kerangka hukum ketenagakerjaan Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode normatif-komparatif dengan pendekatan studi kepustakaan (library research), bersumber dari teks Al-Qur’an, literatur fikih, peraturan perundang-undangan, dan jurnal ilmiah internasional yang relevan. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa bias algoritmik beroperasi melalui tiga mekanisme utama, yaitu bias data latihan, diskriminasi proksi, dan umpan balik diskriminatif, yang secara kolektif menciptakan ketidakadilan struktural yang lebih berbahaya dari bias manusia konvensional karena berskala masif, konsisten, dan sulit digugat. Dari perspektif hukum Islam, bias algoritmik merupakan pelanggaran nyata terhadap prinsip ‘adl (keadilan), musawah (kesetaraan), kaidah la dharara wa la dhirara, dan prinsip amanah, yang secara bersama-sama menuntut audit bias, transparansi sistem, dan pertanggungjawaban berlapis. Sementara itu, kerangka hukum positif Indonesia, meskipun telah memiliki UU No. 13 Tahun 2003 tentang Ketenagakerjaan dan UU No. 27 Tahun 2022 tentang Perlindungan Data Pribadi, mengandung kekosongan normatif yang nyata karena belum mengakui diskriminasi algoritmik sebagai pelanggaran yang dapat dituntut secara hukum dan belum mewajibkan audit bias maupun right to explanation atas keputusan otomatis. Artikel ini menyimpulkan bahwa sinergi antara nilai keadilan Islam dan reformasi hukum positif Indonesia merupakan langkah strategis yang mendesak untuk membangun tata kelola AI rekrutmen yang berkeadilan di Indonesia.
References
Adams-Prassl, J., Binns, R., & Kelly-Lyth, A. (2023). Directly Discriminatory Algorithms. Modern Law Review, 86(1), 144–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12759
Albaroudi, E., Mansouri, T., & Alameer, A. (2024). A Comprehensive Review of AI Techniques for Addressing Algorithmic Bias in Job Hiring. AI (Switzerland), 5(1), 383–404. https://doi.org/10.3390/ai5010019
Ali, F., Bouzoubaa, K., Gelli, F., Hamzi, B., & Khan, S. (2025). Islamic Ethics and AI: An Evaluation of Existing Approaches to AI using Trusteeship Ethics. In Philosophy and Technology (Vol. 38, Number 3). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-025-00922-4
Bommasani, R., Bana, S. H., Creel, K. A., Jurafsky, D., & Liang, P. (2026). Algorithmic Monocultures in Hiring. Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT ’26). https://doi.org/10.1145/3805689.3812400
Chen, Z. (2023). Ethics and Discrimination in Artificial Intelligence-enabled Recruitment Practices. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02079-x
Custers, B., Lahmann, H., & Scott, B. I. (2025). From Liability Gaps to Liability Overlaps: Shared Responsibilities and Fiduciary Duties in AI and Other Complex Technologies. AI and Society, 40(5), 4035–4050. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-024-02137-1
Dastin, J. (2018). Insight - Amazon scraps secret AI recruiting tool that showed bias against women. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-amazon-com-jobs-automation-insight-idUSKCN1MK08G/
Elmahjub, E. (2023). Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Islamic Ethics: Towards Pluralist Ethical Benchmarking for AI. Philosophy and Technology, 36(4), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-023-00668-x
Ghaly, M. (2024). What Makes Work “Good” in the Age of Artificial Intelligence (AI)? Islamic Perspectives on AI-Mediated Work Ethics. Journal of Ethics, 28(3), 429–453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-023-09456-3
Gorian, E., & Osman, N. D. (2024). Digital Ethics of Artificial Intelligence (Ai) in Saudi Arabia and United Arab Emirates. Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law, 12(3), 583–597. https://doi.org/10.33102/mjsl.vol12no3.798
Hughes, K. D., Konnikov, A., Denier, N., & Hu, Y. (2026). Problematizing The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Hiring and Organizational Inequalities: A Multidisciplinary Review. Human Relations, 79(2), 246–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267251403902
Hunkenschroer, A. L., & Kriebitz, A. (2023). Is AI Recruiting (un)ethical? A Human Rights Perspective on The Use of AI for Hiring. AI and Ethics, 3(1), 199–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-022-00166-4
Kelly-Lyth, A. (2023). Algorithmic Discrimination at Work. European Labour Law Journal, 14(2), 152–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/20319525231167300
Mohadi, M., & Tarshany, Y. M. A. (2023). Maqasid Al-Shari’ah and the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Contemporary Maqasid Studies, 2(2), 79–102. https://doi.org/10.52100/jcms.v2i2.107
Rangkuti, A. (2017). Konsep Keadilan dalam Perspektif Islam. TAKZIYA : Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 6(1), 1–21.
Raquib, A., Channa, B., Zubair, T., & Qadir, J. (2022). Islamic Virtue-based Ethics for Artificial Intelligence. Discover Artificial Intelligence, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-022-00028-2
Respati, A. A. (2024). Reformulasi Undang-Undang ITE terhadap Artificial Intelligence Dibandingkan dengan Uni Eropa dan China AI Act Regulation. Jurnal USM Law Review, 7(3), 1737–1758.
Seppälä, P., & Małecka, M. (2024). AI and Discriminative Decisions in Recruitment: Challenging The Core Assumptions. Big Data and Society, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517241235872
Sheard, N. (2025). Algorithm-facilitated Discrimination: A Socio-legal Study of The Use by Employers of Artificial Intelligence Hiring Systems. Journal of Law and Society, 52(2), 269–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.12535
Wang, X., Wu, Y. C., Ji, X., & Fu, H. (2024). Algorithmic Discrimination: Examining Its Types and Regulatory Measures with Emphasis on US Legal Practices. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 7, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2024.1320277
Weerts, H., Kelly-Lyth, A., Binns, R., & Adams-Prassl, J. (2024). Unlawful Proxy Discrimination: A Framework for Challenging Inherently Discriminatory Algorithms. In Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, FAccT 2024. Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3630106.3659010
Zubaidi. (2026). Bias Algoritma Artificial Intellegence ( AI ) Dalam Perspektif Maqāṣid Al-Syariah. J-CEKI : Jurnal Cendekia Ilmiah, 5(3), 743–752.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 JURNAL ILMIAH EKONOMI DAN MANAJEMEN

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.











