Kualitas Hasil Audit di Kantor Akuntan Publik Surabaya ditinjau dari Kompetensi, Independensi dan Objektivitas Auditor

Authors

  • Kiki Lindah Sari Universitas Wijaya Putra Surabaya
  • Vinta Tiara Ayu Pramono Universitas Wijaya Putra Surabaya
  • Andy Iswoyo Universitas Wijaya Putra Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61722/jiem.v2i3.1098

Keywords:

Competence, Independence, Objectivity, Quality of Audit Results

Abstract

The Effect of Competence, Independence and Objectivity Auditor on the Quality of Audit Results (Case Study at the Surabaya City Public Accountant Office).The purpose of this study, among others, to determine the effect of competence, independence, and objectivity of the Surabaya Public Accounting Firm auditors partially or simultaneously affect the quality of audit results.The data collection technique used by the author in this study is a Field Research technique. Field Research is collecting data by conducting field surveys that have to do with the problem being studied. This type of research was conducted to obtain primary data through the distribution of questionnaires as a research instrument. Questionnaire is a data processing technique by distributing questions to auditors who work at Public Accounting Firms. The population of this study is Public Accounting Firms in Surabaya as many as 43 KAP. This research includes quantitative research and the technique used in this research is purposive sampling. The sample in this study was 43 KAP with 54 samples in the study. The secondary data in this study was a questionnaire and the data analysis method used was linear regression analysis which was processed using SPSS 20.0 for Windows (Statistics Program for Social Sciences version 20.0). Based on the results of the t test, it is known that competence, independence, and objectivity partially have a significant effect on the quality of audit results. Meanwhile, from the results of the F test, it is known that competence, independence, and objectivity simultaneously have a significant effect on the quality of audit results.

References

Agoes, Sukrisno., dan Ardana, I Cenik. (2013). Etika Bisnis dan Profesi: Tantangan Membangun Manusia Seutuhnya. Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Anoraga Panji (2014). Psikologi Kerja. Jakarta : PT Rineka Cipta.

Anwar Prabu Mangkunegara. 2015. Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan. Cetakan kedua belas. Remaja Rosdakarya:Bandung

Arens et al. (2011). Jasa Audit dan Assurance, Alih bahasa Amir Abdul Jusuf, Buku 1, 2011, Salemba Empat, Jakarta.

Dessler, Gary. (2015). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Salemba Empat

Effendy (2010) Komunikasi Teori Dan Praktek. Jakarta: PT Grasindo Rosdakarya.

Gujarati, Damodar (2003) Ekonometri Dasar. Terjemahan: Sumarno Zain, Jakarta: Erlangga.

Handoko, Hani. (2006) “Manajemen Personalia dan Sumber Daya Manusia”, Badan Penerbit Fakultas Ekonomi, edisi kedua, Yogyakarta.

Handoko, T. Hani (2011) Manajemen Personalia Sumberdaya Manusia, BPFE, Yogyakarta Hasibuan, Malayu. 2002. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia . Bumi Aksara. Jakarta.

Hasibuan, Malayu S.P. (2016). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Penerbit PT Bumi Aksara

Mulyadi (2017). Akuntansi Biaya, Edisi kelima, UPP STIM YKPN, Yogyakarta.

Nirmala, P.A., dan Cahyonowati, Nur. (2013). Pengaruh Independensi, Pengalaman, Due Professional Care, Akuntabilitas, Kompleksitas Audit, Dan Time Budget Pressure Terhadap Kualitas Audit. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting. Vol. 2. No. 3. ISSN (online) 2337-3806.

Notoatmodjo,S. (2012). Metodologi Penelitian Kesehatan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta Pasolong, Harbani. 2010. Teori Administrasi Publik, Alfabeta, Bandung.

Sukriah, I., Akram, dan Inapty, B.A. (2009). Pengaruh Pengalaman Kerja, Independensi, Obyektifitas, Integritas dan Kompetensi Terhadap Kualitas Hasil Pemeriksaan. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XII, Palembang.

Sutrisno, Edy. (2015). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia (Cetakan ke tujuh). Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Downloads

Published

2024-03-18

Issue

Section

Articles