Perilaku Electronic Word of Mouth dalam Komunitas Belanja Daring: Studi Netnografi pada Pengguna Shopee dan TikTok Shop

Authors

  • Haeruddin Haeruddin Politeknik LP3I Makassar
  • Aigistina Aigistina Universitas Pepabri Makassar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61722/jiem.v4i8.12447

Keywords:

Electronic Word Of Mouth, Online Community, Netnography, Shopee, Tiktok Shop, Social Commerce

Abstract

This study seeks to understand how consumers produce, evaluate, circulate, and negotiate electronic word of mouth (eWOM) within online shopping communities on Shopee and TikTok Shop. It adopts a non-participant observational netnography and a cross-platform comparative design. The intended corpus covers product reviews, video comments, livestream conversations, user replies, and seller responses concerning local beauty products from January to June 2026. Data are purposively selected based on relevance, interactional richness, contextual traceability, and user engagement. Analysis proceeds through initial coding, category development, cross-case theme construction, and digital-cultural interpretation. The analytical framework identifies five themes to be verified against the final corpus: eWOM as experiential evidence, collective verification work, negotiation of authenticity, the transformation of recommendations into advocacy or warnings, and distinct platform logics. Shopee tends to condense eWOM into structured transactional evidence, whereas TikTok Shop turns it into performative, rapid, emotional, and algorithmically visible conversation. The study proposes a community-based eWOM process model linking experience, articulation, social validation, platform amplification, and market consequences. Managerially, sellers should manage eWOM as a dialogic process rather than merely maximizing positive review volume. Because the empirical corpus is not included in this draft, all data counts and findings must be validated before journal submission.

References

Cheah, C. W., Koay, K. Y., & Lim, W. M. (2025). AI-augmented netnography: Ethical and methodological considerations for qualitative digital research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 24. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069251338910

Costello, L., McDermott, M.-L., & Wallace, R. (2017). Netnography: Range of practices, misperceptions, and missed opportunities. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917700647

Dwivedi, Y. K., Ismagilova, E., Hughes, D. L., Carlson, J., Filieri, R., Jacobson, J., Jain, V., Karjaluoto, H., Kefi, H., Krishen, A. S., Kumar, V., Rahman, M. M., Raman, R., Rauschnabel, P. A., Rowley, J., Salo, J., Tran, G. A., & Wang, Y. (2021). Setting the future of digital and social media marketing research. International Journal of Information Management, 59, 102168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102168

Gvili, Y., & Levy, S. (2023). I share, therefore I trust: A moderated mediation model of the influence of eWOM engagement on social commerce. Journal of Business Research, 166, 114131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114131

Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P., Walsh, G., & Gremler, D. D. (2004). Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the Internet? Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(1), 38–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.10073

Hussain, S., Song, X., & Niu, B. (2020). Consumers’ motivational involvement in eWOM for information adoption: The mediating role of organizational motives. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 3055. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03055

Ilhamalimy, R. R., & Ali, H. (2021). Model perceived risk and trust: E-WOM and purchase intention (the role of trust mediating in online shopping in Shopee Indonesia). Dinasti International Journal of Digital Business Management, 2(2), 204–221. https://doi.org/10.31933/dijdbm.v2i2.651

Indrawati, Yones, P. C. P., & Muthaiyah, S. (2023). eWOM via the TikTok application and its influence on the purchase intention of Somethinc products. Asia Pacific Management Review, 28(2), 174–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2022.07.007

Kozinets, R. V. (2020). Netnography: The essential guide to qualitative social media research (3rd ed.). SAGE.

Kozinets, R. V., & Gretzel, U. (2024). Netnography evolved: New contexts, scope, procedures and sensibilities. Annals of Tourism Research, 104, 103693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2023.103693

Levy, S., & Gvili, Y. (2024). Self as source: The interplay of sharing eWOM with consumer engagement and incentive acceptance. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 80, 103926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.103926

Moghaddam, H. A., Carlson, J., Wyllie, J., & Rahman, S. M. (2024). Scroll, stop, shop: Decoding impulsive buying in social commerce. Journal of Business Research, 177, 114776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114776

Ngo, T. T. A., Bui, C. T., Chau, H. K. L., & Tran, N. P. N. (2024). The impact of eWOM information in social media on the online purchase intention of Generation Z. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 2316933. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2316933

Putri, N., Prasetya, Y., Handayani, P. W., & Fitriani, H. (2024). TikTok Shop: How trust and privacy influence Generation Z’s purchasing behaviors. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1), 2292759. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2292759

Sadat, A., Villani, V. S., Aguiar, R., Nguyen, N., Wright, F. C., & Berlin, A. (2025). Utilization of netnography as a health care research methodology: Scoping review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 27, e78025. https://doi.org/10.2196/78025

Downloads

Published

2026-08-20

Issue

Section

Articles