PARADOKS PURBAYA EFFECT: FENOMENA BOTTLENECK PEMBIAYAAN SEKTOR UMKM DI TENGAH LIKUIDITAS JUMBO DAN PERSPEKTIF EKONOMI ISLAM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61722/jiem.v4i1.8237Keywords:
Purbaya Effect, MSME Bottleneck, Liquidity Abundance, Capacity Building, Distributive Justice.Abstract
The liquidity injection policy utilizing the Accumulated Budget Surplus (SAL) of IDR 200 trillion aims to create the "Purbaya Effect" to lower the Cost of Funds and stimulate the real sector. However, this research uncovers a policy transmission paradox. This study aims to analyze the bottleneck phenomenon in capital flows to the MSME sector and evaluate its compatibility with Sharia distribution principles. Employing a descriptive-qualitative method with secondary data from January to December 2025, this study reveals significant anomalies. Although the Cost of Funds successfully declined, data shows a sharp disparity: corporate credit grew rapidly, while MSME credit experienced a contraction, plummeting from 4.1% growth (January 2025) to -0.9% (December 2025). These findings indicate that the bottleneck resulted from banking risk aversion and the MSMEs' lack of capacity to absorb this liquidity abundance. From an Islamic economic perspective, this condition points to the practice of "Institutional Ikniz" (hoarding), which violates distributive justice. This study recommends a paradigm shift from mere liquidity injection toward ecosystem strengthening through massive capacity building to mitigate market failure risks.
References
Antonio, M. S. (2001). Bank syariah: dari teori ke praktik (Cetakan 1). Gema Insani Press.
Asutay, M. (2007). A Political Economy Approach to Islamic Economics: Systemic Understanding for an Alternative Economic System. A Political Economy Approach to Islamic Economics: Systemic Understanding for an Alternative Economic System, 1–2, 3–18.
Berita Resmi Statistik. (2025). Ekonomi Indonesia Triwulan III-2025 Tumbuh 5,04 Persen (Y-on-Y). Badan Pusat Statistik. https://www.bps.go.id/id/pressrelease/2025/11/05/2478/ekonomi-indonesia-triwulan-iii-2025-tumbuh-5-04-persen--y-on-y-.html
Bernanke, B. S., & Gertler, M. (1995). Inside the Black Box: The Credit Channel of Monetary Policy Transmission. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 27–48. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.4.27
Chapra, M. U. (2000). The future of Islamic economics : an Islamic perspective. The Islamic Foundation.
Departemen Kebijakan Ekonomi dan Moneter. (2025). Tinjauan Kebijakan Moneter Desember 2025. Bank Indonesia. https://www.bi.go.id/id/publikasi/laporan/default.aspx
Kementerian Keuangan Republik Indonesia. Keputusan Menteri Keuangan Republik Indonesia Nomor 276 Tahun 2025 Tentang Penempatan Uang Negara Dalam Rangka Pengelolaan Kelebihan Dan Kekurangan Kas Untuk Mendukung Pelaksanaan Program Pemerintah Dalam Mendorong Pertumbuhan Ekonomi, Pub. L. No. 276 (2025).
LPEM FEB UI & UNDP. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on MSMEs in Indonesia. LPEM FEB UI & UNDP. https://www.id.undp.org/content/indonesia/en/home/library/ImpactofCOVID19MSMEs.html.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Mishkin, F. S. (2007). The Economics Of Money, Banking, And Financial Markets. Pearson Addison-Wesley.
OJK. (2025). Statistik Perbankan Indonesia. https://ojk.go.id/id/kanal/perbankan/data-dan-statistik/statistik-perbankan-indonesia/Default.aspx
Stiglitz, J. E., & Weiss, A. (1981). Credit Rationing in Markets with Imperfect Information. In The American Economic Review (Vol. 71, Issue 3, pp. 393–410). http:/links.jstor.org
Warjiyo, P., & Juhro, S. M. (2019). Central Bank Policy: Theory and Practice. In Central Bank Policy: Theory and Practice (Issue April 2016). https://doi.org/10.1108/9781789737516
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 JURNAL ILMIAH EKONOMI DAN MANAJEMEN

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.










