Implementasi Budaya Kerja Organisasi dalam Menciptakan Lingkungan Kerja Kondusif di PT Ganesa Mitra Edutama
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61722/jiem.v4i4.9580Keywords:
Organizational Work Culture; Work Environment; Internal Communication.Abstract
A conducive work environment is one of the essential factors in supporting employee performance and comfort. PT. Ganesa Mitra Edutama, a company operating in the education and service sector, faces challenges in consistently implementing organizational work culture to create a harmonious, comfortable, and productive work environment. The issues encountered are related to internal communication patterns, the implementation of work values, and the alignment of employee work behavior with the prevailing organizational culture. This study aims to examine the implementation of organizational work culture in creating a conducive work environment at PT. Ganesa Mitra Edutama and to formulate improvement strategies for organizational culture that can be implemented by the company.This study employs a qualitative descriptive approach, with informants selected through purposive sampling, focusing on key persons who possess an in-depth understanding of the company’s work culture and work environment. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, observation, and documentation. The analysis is based on the work environment theory proposed by Budiasa (2021:43), which includes indicators of physical and non-physical work environment, such as work relationships, communication, comfort, work atmosphere, and leadership support.The results indicate the implementation of organizational work culture at PT. Ganesa Mitra Edutama has been carried out fairly well, particularly in fostering harmonious work relationships and a familial work atmosphere. However, several aspects still require improvement, especially in the consistency of applying organizational work culture values, internal communication patterns, and strengthening the role of leadership as a role model for organizational culture. The proposed organizational culture improvement strategies include reinforcing work culture values through continuous socialization, enhancing internal communication quality, and creating a more participative work system to support the establishment of a more conducive work environment.
References
Arikunto, S. (2011). Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Asmawati, F., Dinar, K. L., Sundari, S., & Pakpahan, M. (2024). Tantangan dan strategi manajemen sumber daya manusia dalam menghadapi fenomena great resignation. Jurnal Cakrawala Akademika (JCA), 1(3), 987–1006.
Basrowi, & Suwandi. (2008). Memahami penelitian kualitatif. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Black, J. A., & Champion, D. J. (2009). Metode dan masalah penelitian sosial (E. Kosmara, D. Salam, & A. Ruzhendi, Trans., Edisi ke-4). Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Bungin, B. (2007). Penelitian kualitatif. Jakarta: Kencana.
Colquitt, J. A. (2014). Organizational behavior: Improving performance and commitment in the workplace (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
Fajriah, Y. (2025). Strategi manajemen sumber daya manusia dalam menghadapi turnover tinggi. Jurnal Economia, 4(3), 97–103.
Gomes, F. C. (2000). Manajemen sumber daya manusia (Cetakan keempat). Yogyakarta: Andi.
Handoko, T. H. (2003). Manajemen sumber daya manusia. Yogyakarta: BPFE.
Hariawan, F., & Atmajawati, Y. (2018). Analisis faktor yang mempengaruhi tingkat turnover intention pada perusahaan jasa konsultan di Surabaya. Majalah Ekonomi, 23(2), 184–201.
Hasibuan, M. S. P. (2011). Manajemen sumber daya manusia. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Heryana, A. (2015). Informan dan pemilihan informan pada penelitian kualitatif. Universitas Esa Unggul, 1–14.
Jazuli, M. (2001). Manajemen produksi seni pertunjukan. Yogyakarta: Yayasan Lentera Budaya.
Li, L., Zhu, Y., & Park, C. (2018). Leader–member exchange, sales performance, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment affect turnover intention. Social Behavior and Personality, 46(11), 1909–1922.
Mobley, W. H. (2011). Pergantian karyawan: Sebab, akibat, dan pengendaliannya (N. Iman, Trans.). Jakarta: PPM.
Moleong, L. J. (2011). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Mondy, R. W., & Martocchio, J. J. (2016). Human resource management (14th ed.). United States: Pearson Education Limited.
Ridlo, I. A. (2012). Turn over karyawan: Kajian literatur. Surabaya: PH Movement Publication.
Rivai, V., & Jauvani, E. (2009). Manajemen sumber daya manusia untuk perusahaan. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2015). Perilaku organisasi (Edisi ke-16). Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Ruslan, R. (2004). Metode penelitian public relations dan komunikasi. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Subagyo, J. P. (1991). Metode penelitian dalam teori dan praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sumardin. (2023). Strategi manajemen sumber daya manusia dalam menghadapi pandemi Covid untuk menjaga tingkat turnover karyawan. JPPI (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia), 9(2), 741–747.
Supriyati. (2012a). Metodologi penelitian komputerisasi akuntansi. Bandung: LABKAT.
Supriyati. (2012b). Akuntansi keuangan bisnis. Bandung: LABKAT.
Umi, N., Anggadini, S. D., & Ismawati, L. (2011). Penulisan karya ilmiah (Edisi pertama). Bekasi: Genesis.
Usman, H. (2011). Manajemen: Teori, praktik, dan riset pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Zahara, T. R. (2016). Siapa harus pergi siapa harus tinggal: Strategi mencegah turnover intention Gen-Y. Jakarta: Pusat Studi Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 JURNAL ILMIAH EKONOMI DAN MANAJEMEN

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.










