BATAS EPISTEMOLOGIS SAINS DALAM PENAFSIRAN AL-QUR'AN: Tinjauan Kritis atas Praktik Pseudosains dalam Tafsir Ilmi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61722/jinu.v3i4.10269Keywords:
interpretation of science, pseudoscience, epistemology, limits of science, Qur'anAbstract
The integration between empirical science and the interpretation of the Qur'an has become one of the most dynamic issues in the study of contemporary interpretation. This tendency commonly called scientific interpretation, on the one hand, opens up a constructive dialogue between revelation and scientific knowledge, but on the other hand has the potential to give birth to pseudoscientific claims that appear to be superficial scientific but do not have a solid methodological foundation. This research investigates the epistemological boundaries that should govern the relationship between science and interpretation, as well as mapping the variety of pseudoscientific practices found in the tradition of interpretation. Using a qualitative-descriptive literature study approach, this study concludes that the contribution of science in interpretation should be limited to the function of illustration and confirmation, not as an authority to determine the meaning of the text. Various patterns of pseudoscience that have been successfully identified include excessive retrofitting of interpretations, the use of outdated scientific theories, the exploitation of numerical ambiguity, and the presentation of anecdotal evidence as if it represents scientific consensus. These findings confirm the need for a robust epistemological framework to maintain the integrity of interpretation while preventing distortions of religious understanding.
References
Ansory, I., & Kholis, M. N. (2026). Tafsir Saintifik dalam Penafsiran Al-Qur’an: Analisis Kritis atas Epistemologi dan Metodologinya. Ta’wiluna: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an, Tafsir Dan Pemikiran Islam, 7(1), 87–99.
Blancke, S., & Boudry, M. (2022). Pseudoscience as a Negative Outcome of Scientific Dialogue: A Pragmatic-Naturalistic Approach to the Demarcation Problem. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 34, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/02698595.2022.2057777
De Cruz, H. (2025). Religion and Science. Dalam E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2025). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2025/entries/religion-science/
Faizin, F. (2017). Integrasi Agama dan Sains dalam Tafsir Ilmi Kementerian Agama RI. Jurnal Ushuluddin, 25(1), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.24014/jush.v25i1.2560
Firmansyah, R. (2021). Tafsir Ilmi in Indonesia: History, Paradigm and Dynamic Interpretation. Insyirah: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa Arab Dan Studi Islam, 4(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.26555/insyirah.v4i1.4206
Guessoum, N. (2010). Islam’s Quantum Question. https://www.torrossa.com/it/resources/an/5209168
Ilahiyah, M. N., & Sanuri, S. (2025). Rules and Historical Sources of Asbab al-Nuzul: A Theoretical-Epistemological Critique. QiST: Journal of Quran and Tafseer Studies, 4(3), 925–944. https://doi.org/10.23917/qist.v4i3.13367
Maharani, D., Handrianto, B., & Indra, H. (2026). EPISTEMOLOGI ISLAM INTEGRATIF: ANALISIS KOMPREHENSIF EMPAT SUMBER ILMU (PANCA INDRA, AKAL, WAHYU, DAN ILHAM). EDUCATIONAL : Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan & Pengajaran, 6(1), 406–414. https://doi.org/10.51878/educational.v6i1.9319
Mahdi, I., Dewi, E., & Ritonga, K. R. (t.t.). Fenomenologi: Karl Popper (Falsifikasi).
Munawar, S. (2025a). Exploring Scientific Exegesis (Al-Tafsīr Al-‘Ilmī) of the Quran: Merits, Challenges, and Interpretive Boundaries. Journal of Religion and Society, 3(02), 414–424.
Munawar, S. (2025b). Exploring Scientific Exegesis (Al-Tafsīr Al-‘Ilmī) of the Quran: Merits, Challenges, and Interpretive Boundaries. Journal of Religion and Society, 3(02), 414–424.
Nafisah, M. (2023a). Tafsir Ilmi: Sejarah, Paradigma dan Dinamika Tafsir. Al-Fanar : Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir, 6(2), 63–80. https://doi.org/10.33511/alfanar.v6n2.63-80
Nafisah, M. (2023b). Tafsir Ilmi: Sejarah, Paradigma dan Dinamika Tafsir. Al-Fanar : Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir, 6(2), 63–80. https://doi.org/10.33511/alfanar.v6n2.63-80
Nafisah, M. (2023c). Tafsir Ilmi: Sejarah, Paradigma dan Dinamika Tafsir. Al-Fanar : Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir, 6(2), 63–80. https://doi.org/10.33511/alfanar.v6n2.63-80
Popper, K. (2005). The logic of scientific discovery. Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9780203994627/logic-scientific-discovery-karl-popper-karl-popper
Setyanoor, E., Anwar, K., & Mahfuzh, T. W. (2025). Tafsir Al-Qur’an di Era Global: Antara Konservatisme Klasik dan Inovasi Kontemporer. Interdisciplinary Explorations in Research Journal, 3(3), 1083–1103.
Supriadi, A. (2017). Integrating Qur’an and Science: Epistemology of Tafsir Ilmi in Indonesia. Refleksi: Jurnal Kajian Agama Dan Filsafat, 16(2), 149–186. https://doi.org/10.15408/ref.v16i2.10191
Syahril, S. (2009). KONTROVERSI PARA MUFASIR DI SEPUTAR TAFSÎR BI AL-ILMI. Millah: Journal of Religious Studies, 225–239. https://doi.org/10.20885/millah.vol8.iss2.art2
Thaib, Z. B. H., & Annisa, V. (2024). KAJIAN ANALITIS ASPEK SOSIAL SURAT AL-MUMTAHANAH DALAM TAFSIR TANTAWI JAWHARI: PERSPEKTIF ULUMUL QUR’AN. Edukasi Islami: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 13(04), 937–950. https://doi.org/10.30868/ei.v13i04.9426
Thomas Kuhn: Paradigm Shift. (2023, Juli 31). https://www.simplypsychology.org/kuhn-paradigm.html
Wijayanti, L. (2024). TAFSIR ILMI AL-QUR’AN: BATASAN DAN POTENSI DALAM INTEGRASI SAINS MODERN. Jurnal Quran Hadis, 1(1). https://oj.mjukn.org/index.php/jqh/article/view/2660
Yusufa, U. (2014). MUKJIZAT MATEMATIS DALAM AL-QUR’AN: Kritik Wacana dengan Pendekatan Sains dan Budaya. HERMENEUTIK, 8, 343. https://doi.org/10.21043/hermeneutik.v8i2.897
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 JURNAL ILMIAH NUSANTARA

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.










