Penolakan Gugatan Perceraian oleh Pihak Penyebab Konflik Rumah Tangga: Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1465 K/Pdt/2025

Moch. Ilhan Izza Irfani; Mochammad Fahd Akbar

doi:10.61722/jinu.v3i5.10897

Authors

Moch. Ilhan Izza Irfani Universitas Hasyim Asy’ari Tebuireng Jombang
Mochammad Fahd Akbar Universitas Hasyim Asy’ari Tebuireng Jombang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61722/jinu.v3i5.10897

Keywords:

Divorce, Supreme Court, Trouble Maker, Jurisprudence, Judge's Consideration

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legal considerations of the Supreme Court in Decision Number 1465 K/Pdt/2025, which rejected the divorce suit because the plaintiff was deemed the main cause of the domestic conflict (troublemaker). This decision is interesting because it presents a different legal construction from divorce court practices that generally focus on proving continuous disputes and quarrels without the hope of living together in harmony again. This study uses a normative legal research method with a case approach and a conceptual approach. The primary legal materials are court decisions and laws related to divorce, while secondary legal materials are books, journals, and previous research results. The results show that the Supreme Court not only considers the existence of domestic conflict as a reason for divorce but also assesses the parties' contributions in creating the conflict. The Supreme Court places the plaintiff's behavior as the main factor causing the breakdown of the household, so that the divorce suit she filed is deemed unworthy of being granted. Such considerations indicate a shift from an approach oriented on the fact of the conflict to an approach that also takes into account the dimension of the parties' moral responsibility. This decision has the potential to become an important precedent in the development of family law in Indonesia because it broadens the scope of judges' considerations in divorce cases.or formula.

References

Maimun, (2022). Pernikahan Dalam Kompilasi Hukum Islam Dan Perdata. Jurnal Al-Mizan: Jurnal Hukum Islam Dan Ekonomi Syariah, Vol. 9, No. 1, 14

Rosalina Afifah Dkk. (2025). Kompilasi 100+ Kaidah Hukum Hakim & Yurisprudensi (Hukum Perdata, Hukum Perdata Islam, Hukum Pidana, & Hukum Tata Usaha Negara), Jakarta: Publica Indonesia Utama, Edisi I, Hal 72-73

Yuni Priskila Ginting, Laurencia dkk., (2023). Analisis Pembuktian Hukum Perceraian di Indonesia. Jurnal Pengabdian West Science, Vol. 02, No. 11, pp. 1166-1176, 1169

Junaedi, (2023). Peranan Dan Eksistensi Yurisprudensi Dalam Sistem Hukum Di Indonesia. LEX LAGUENS: Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan, Vol. 1, No. 1, Hal. 3.

Mhd. Fakhrurrahman Arif, Raja Nur Fazlina, (2024). Upaya Menjamin Hak. Siyasah: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara, Volume 7, Edisi I. e-ISSN: 2656-9671, p-ISSN: 2685-6077

Haura Hanifah, Lathifa Salsabillah, Allisa Tazkia Fitri, Riska Mona Febriani, Rully Hidayatullah, Harmonedi, (2025). Landasan Teori, Penelitian Relevan, Kerangka Berpikir Dan Hipotesis Penelitian. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, Universitas Islam Negeri Imam Bonjol Padang, Volume 3, Nomor 2.

Angela Artha Tyara Ananda, (2024). Teori Positivisme Hukum. Jurnal Penelitian Ilmiah Multidisiplin, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Vol 8 No. 11, Hal. 62.

Asshiddiqi Jimly, Ali safa’at M., (2006). Teori Hans Kelsen Tentang Hukum, Jakarta: Penerbit Sekretariat Jendral & Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi RI, Edisi 1

Nur Talita Prapta Putri, Ananda Aulia, (2023) Penerapan Teori Positivisme Hans Kelsen Di Indonesia, Das Sollen: Jurnal Kajian Kontemporer Hukum dan Masyarakat Vol. 01, Hal. 4.

Enrico Simanjuntak, (2019). Peran Yurisprudensi dalam Sistem Hukum di Indonesia. Jurnal Konstitusi, Vol. 16, No. 1 ,Hal. 84.

Tengku Rizki Rahman, Sukiati, Mhd Yadi Harahap, (2025). Yurisprudensi Hukum KDRT Sebagai Alasan Gugatan Cerai Melalui Putusan Pengadilan. Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum, Vol. 3 No. 3.

Edwin Yuliska, (2023). Upaya Hukum Perdata Terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Yang Belum Memuaskan Pihak Berperkara. Jurnal Normative, Vol. 11, No. 2, Hal. 123-124.

Aprianto Sandry Lebang, Caecilia Johanna Julietta Waha, Rudolf Sam Mamengko, (2023). Analisis Hukum Perceraian Serta Implikasinya Terhadap Anak Dibawah Umur. Jurnal Apriatno Lebang Unstrat.

Ahmad Rosidi, M. Zainuddin, Ismi Arifiana, (2024). Metode Dalam Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dan Sosiologis (Field Research). Journal Law and Government, Vol. 2, No. 1, Hal. 47.

Sugiyono, (2016). Metode penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Dan R&D. Bandung: ALFABETA, 2016, Hal. 137.

Ignatius Harbrian Hutomo, Thomas, Wisnu Erlangga, (2024). Pengajuan Kasasi Atas Dasar Kewenangan Pengadilan. Jurnal Verstek Bagian Hukum Acara Universitas Sebelas Maret, Vol. 2 No. 3, Hal. 80.

Bok Rok Su, Gunardi Lie dan Moody Rizqy Syailendra Putra, (2025). Legal Vacuum And Unclear Liability Of E-Commerce Platforms For Illegal Products In Digital Transactions. Rewang Rencang : Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis. Vol.6. No.4, Hal. 2.

Nur Talita Prapta Putri, Ananda Aulia, (2023). Penerapan Teori Positivisme Hans Kelsen Di Indonesia. Das Sollen: Jurnal Kajian Kontemporer Hukum dan Masyarakat, Vol. 02:01, Hal 6.

Pasal 19 huruf f Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 9 Tahun 1975

Ghini Rofifa, (2025). Analisis Yurisprudensi Putusan Peradilan Agama terkait Perceraian yang dipicu oleh Media Sosial. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai Hukum Keluarga, Universitas Islam Negeri Imam Bonjol Padang, Vol. 9, No. 3, Hal. 8.

Erni Erni, Tajul Arifin, (2025). Perceraian dalam Perspektif Hadits Riwayat Abu Dawud dan Pasal 39 Ayat (2) UU No. 1 Tahun 1974. Desentralisasi : Jurnal Hukum, Kebijakan Publik, dan Pemerintahan Volume. 2 Nomor. Hal. 95.