PENGARUH COPING SKILL DAN PEMANFAATAN AI CHATBOT TERHADAP KINERJA AKADEMIK MAHASISWA AKUNTANSI PERGURUAN TINGGI NEGERI DI MALANG

Nadiya Tasyrieka; Unti Ludigdo

doi:10.61722/jinu.v3i6.12635

Authors

Nadiya Tasyrieka Universitas Brawijaya
Unti Ludigo Universitas Brawijaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61722/jinu.v3i6.12635

Keywords:

Coping Skills; AI Chatbot; Academic Performance.

Abstract

Students in their final academic stage face academic demands that may affect their ability to cope with pressure and their academic achievement. The increasing use of AI Chatbots for academic activities also raises questions regarding their relationship with students’ academic performance. This study aims to analyse the effect of coping skills and AI Chatbot utilisation on the academic performance of Accounting students at public universities in Malang. This quantitative study involved 207 students selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected using a Likert-scale questionnaire and Grade Point Average (GPA), then analysed using multiple linear regression with SPSS 26. The results show that coping skills have no effect on students’ academic performance, with a t-value of -1.043 and p-value of 0.298. AI Chatbot utilisation also has no effect on academic performance, with a t-value of 0.066 and p-value of 0.947. The simultaneous test produced an F-value of 0.974 with a p-value of 0.379. The R² value of 0.009 indicates that coping skills and AI Chatbot utilisation explain only 0.9% of the variation in academic performance. Students’ academic performance is therefore not determined by coping skills and AI Chatbot utilisation, either individually or simultaneously, indicating that other factors contribute to academic achievement.

References

Buku

Amruddin, Priyanda, R., Agustina, T. S., Asriantini, N. S., Rusmayani, N. G. A. L., Aslindar, D. A., Ningsih, K. P., Wulandari, S., Putranto, P., Yuniati, I., Untari, I., Mujiani, S., & Wicaksono, D. (2022). Metodologi penelitian kuantitatif. Pradina Pustaka.

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy in changing societies. Cambridge University Press.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.

Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi analisis multivariate dengan program IBM SPSS 25 (9th ed.).

Ghozali, I., & Kusumadewi, K. A. (2023). Partial least squares: Konsep, teknik dan aplikasi menggunakan program SmartPLS 4.0 untuk penelitian empiris. Yoga Pratama.

Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (1992). Multivariate data analysis with readings (3rd ed.). Macmillan Publishing Company.

Hair, J. F. Jr., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Hardani, Auliya, N. H., Andriani, H., Fardani, R. A., Ustiawaty, J., Utami, E. F., Dhika Juliana, S., & Ria Rahmatul, I. (2020). Metode penelitian kualitatif & kuantitatif. CV. Pustaka Ilmu.

Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer Publishing Company.

Machali, I. (2021). Metode penelitian kuantitatif. Fakultas Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta.

Sembiring, T. Br., Irmawati, Sabir, M., & Tjahyadi, I. (2024). Buku ajar metodologi penelitian (teori & praktik). CV Saba Jaya Publisher.

Sugiyono. (2023). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. ALFABETA.

Jurnal

Abbas, M., Jam, F. A., & Khan, T. I. (2024). Is it harmful or helpful? Examining the causes and consequences of generative AI usage among university students. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00444-7

Ahmad, I., Gul, R., & Zeb, M. (2024). A qualitative inquiry of university student’s experiences of exam stress and its effect on their academic performance. Human Arenas, 7(4), 778–788. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-022-00285-8

Almulla, M. A., & Al-Rahmi, W. M. (2023). Integrated Social Cognitive Theory with learning input factors: The effects of problem-solving skills and critical thinking skills on learning performance sustainability. Sustainability, 15(5), 3978. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15053978

Al-Sharafi, M. A., Al-Emran, M., Iranmanesh, M., Al-Qaysi, N., Iahad, N. A., & Arpaci, I. (2023). Understanding the impact of knowledge management factors on the sustainable use of AI-based chatbots for educational purposes using a hybrid SEM-ANN approach. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(10), 7491–7510. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2075014

Barbayannis, G., Bandari, M., Zheng, X., Baquerizo, H., Pecor, K. W., & Ming, X. (2022). Academic stress and mental well-being in college students: Correlations, affected groups, and COVID-19. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.886344

Bressane, A., Zwirn, D., Essiptchouk, A., Saraiva, A. C. V., Carvalho, F. L. de C., Formiga, J. K. S., Medeiros, L. C. de C., & Negri, R. G. (2024). Understanding the role of study strategies and learning disabilities on student academic performance to enhance educational approaches: A proposal using artificial intelligence. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100196

Brook, S., & Roberts, M. (2021). What are the determinants of student performance on an undergraduate accounting degree? Journal of Further and Higher Education, 45(9), 1224–1239. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2021.1882666

Carver, C. S. (1997). You want to measure coping but your protocol’s too long: Consider the Brief COPE. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 4(1), 92–100. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327558ijbm0401_6

Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Weintraub, J. K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(2), 267–283. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.56.2.267

Ciftci, S. K., & Karadag, E. (2024). Grade inflation effects of capacity expansion in higher education: A longitudinal study in undergraduate teacher education programs from 2003 to 2022. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03387-6

Eko Sujadi. (2022). Academic stress in the final-year students: Do religiosity and religious coping matter? Bisma The Journal of Counseling, 6(3), 304–315. https://doi.org/10.23887/bisma.v6i3.52735

Fan, Y., Tang, L., Le, H., Shen, K., Tan, S., Zhao, Y., Shen, Y., Li, X., & Gašević, D. (2025). Beware of metacognitive laziness: Effects of generative artificial intelligence on learning motivation, processes, and performance. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56(2), 489–530. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13544

Gibbons, C. (2022). Understanding the role of stress, personality and coping on learning motivation and mental health in university students during a pandemic. BMC Psychology, 10(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-022-00971-w

Habibulloh, M. R., Suharsono, A., & Wardhono, W. S. (2025). Analisis persepsi penggunaan ChatGPT terhadap kemampuan critical thinking mahasiswa Fakultas Ilmu Komputer Universitas Brawijaya. Jurnal Pengembangan Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer, 9(7).

Hamu, F. J., Wea, D., & Setiyaningtiyas, N. (2023). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi kinerja akademik mahasiswa: Analisis structural equation model. Jurnal Paedagogy, 10(1), 175–186.

Haugland Sundkvist, C., & Kulset, E. M. (2024). Teaching accounting in the era of ChatGPT – The student perspective. Journal of Accounting Education, 69, 100932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2024.100932

Jahara, S. F., Hussain, M., Kumar, T., Goodarzi, A., & Assefa, Y. (2022). The core of self-assessment and academic stress among EFL learners: The mediating role of coping styles. Language Testing in Asia, 12(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-022-00170-9

Kao, P. C. (2024). Exploring the roles of academic expectation stress, adaptive coping, and academic resilience on perceived English proficiency. BMC Psychology, 12(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01630-y

Kreibich, A., Wolf, B. M., Bettschart, M., Ghassemi, M., Herrmann, M., & Brandstätter, V. (2022). How self-awareness is connected to less experience of action crises in personal goal pursuit. Motivation and Emotion, 46(6), 825–836. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-022-09942-5

Liang, H., & Mao, X. (2025). Emotion regulation and perceptions of academic stress as key predictors of academic motivation in second language learning. PLOS ONE, 20(8), e0327071. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0327071

Morell-Mengual, V., Fernández-García, O., Berenguer, C., Ortega-Barón, J., Gil-Llario, M. D., & Estruch-García, V. (2025). Characteristics, motivations and attitudes of students using ChatGPT and other language model-based chatbots in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 30(15), 22257–22274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13650-1

Naurah, E. S., & Dewantara, B. A. (2025). Efektivitas ChatGPT sebagai alat bantu dalam menyelesaikan tugas akademik mahasiswa Teknologi Pendidikan Universitas Lambung Mangkurat. Journal of Instructional Technology, 6(2), 127–134. https://doi.org/10.20527/j-instech.v6i2.15633

Navarro, R., Vega, V., Bayona, H., Bernal, V., & Garcia, A. (2023). Relationship between technology acceptance model, self-regulation strategies, and academic self-efficacy with academic performance and perceived learning among college students during remote education. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1227956

Pallant, J. L., Blijlevens, J., Campbell, A., & Jopp, R. (2026). Mastering knowledge: The impact of generative AI on student learning outcomes. Studies in Higher Education, 51(4), 714–735. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2025.2487570

Pels, F., Schäfer-Pels, A., & von Haaren-Mack, B. (2023). Measuring students’ coping with the Brief COPE: An investigation testing different factor structures across two contexts of university education. Tuning Journal for Higher Education, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.18543/tjhe.2251

Pérez-Jorge, D., Boutaba-Alehyan, M., González-Contreras, A. I., & Pérez-Pérez, I. (2025). Examining the effects of academic stress on student well-being in higher education. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), 449. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04698-y

Prayoga, H., & Wakhid, Z. N. (2024). AI chatbot distractions and academic triumphs: A mediation approach with self-control and coping skills. Journal of Accounting and Investment, 25(2), 673–691. https://doi.org/10.18196/jai.v25i2.20755

Ruiz-Camacho, C., Gozalo, M., & Sánchez Casado, I. (2025). The mediating role of active coping strategies in the relationship between academic stressors and stress responses among university students. Healthcare, 13(14), 1674. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13141674

Schei, O. M., Møgelvang, A., & Ludvigsen, K. (2024). Perceptions and use of AI chatbots among students in higher education: A scoping review of empirical studies. Education Sciences, 14(8), 922. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14080922

Scott, W. D., Cervone, D., & Ebiringah, O. U. (2024). The social-cognitive clinician: On the implications of social cognitive theory for psychotherapy and assessment. International Journal of Psychology, 59(5), 616–623. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.13125

Suleiman, I. B., Okunade, O. A., Dada, E. G., & Ezeanya, U. C. (2024). Key factors influencing students’ academic performance. Journal of Electrical Systems and Information Technology, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43067-024-00166-w

Tafesse, W. (2022). Social networking sites use and college students’ academic performance: Testing for an inverted U-shaped relationship using automated mobile app usage data. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00322-0

Tharapos, M., Lau, K. H., Peszynski, K., Nguyen, L. A., Magdziarz, S., Morton, E., Borg, V., & Duan, S. (2025). Generative AI in accounting education: Evaluating ChatGPT’s role in assessment and skill development. Accounting and Finance, 65(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.70051

Vizoso, C., Arias-Gundín, O., & Rodríguez, C. (2019). Exploring coping and optimism as predictors of academic burnout and performance among university students. Educational Psychology, 39(6), 768–783. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2018.1545996

Woreta, G. T., Zewude, G. T., & Józsa, K. (2025). The mediating role of self-efficacy and outcome expectations in the relationship between peer context and academic engagement: A social cognitive theory perspective. Behavioral Sciences, 15(5), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15050681

Wu, R., & Yu, Z. (2024). Do AI chatbots improve students learning outcomes? Evidence from a meta-analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(1), 10–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13334

Sumber Website

Yonatan, A. Z. (2025). 95% Mahasiswa RI gunakan AI dalam proses pembelajaran. GoodStats.

Yulianti, C. (2025). Survei BRIN: 90 persen lebih mahasiswa PTKIN pakai ChatGPT hampir tiap hari. DetikEdu.

.