TINJAUAN ANALISIS PRINSIP ULTRA VIRES TERHADAP PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN HUKUM DIREKSI PERSEROAN TERBATAS ATAS KEPAILITAN PERUSAHAAN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61722/jinu.v1i6.2827Keywords:
Ultra vires, directors' responsibility, bankruptcy, Limited Liability Company Law (UU PT)Abstract
The principle of ultra vires is an important legal concept in the corporate context, particularly regarding the authority and legal responsibility of the board of directors. In Indonesian law, this principle refers to actions taken by a corporate body or its organ that exceed the authority granted by the company’s articles of association or applicable regulations. This article aims to analyze the application of the ultra vires principle within the framework of corporate law, specifically in the context of the directors' legal responsibility related to corporate bankruptcy under Law No. 40 of 2007 on Limited Liability Companies (UU PT) and Law No. 37 of 2004 on Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations (UU Kepailitan). This research uses a normative (doctrinal) approach, with an analysis of applicable laws, legal doctrines, and relevant court decisions. The findings indicate that although the ultra vires principle faces challenges in its application within Indonesian legal practice especially due to a lack of clarity regarding actions that exceed the authority of directors this principle still plays a crucial role in assessing the legal responsibility of directors in bankruptcy cases. Actions that are deemed ultra vires by the directors may lead to civil liability, and even criminal liability, if they cause harm to the company and creditors.
References
Artikel
Dwi Suryahartati, SH, M.Kn. (2021). Doktrin Ultra Vires: Perspektif Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas. Neliti.
Mulyadi, M. (2023). "Implikasi Tanggung Jawab Hukum Direksi dalam Kepailitan Perusahaan Berdasarkan UU PT". Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi.
Santoso, A. (2019). "Analisis Tanggung Jawab Direksi terhadap Kepailitan Perusahaan dalam Perspektif Hukum Perdata Indonesia". Jurnal Ilmu Hukum.
Gea, A. F., Hirsanuddin, H., & Djumardin, D. (2020). Tanggung jawab direksi atas terjadinya pailit perseroan terbatas. JESS (Journal of Education on Social Science), 4(1).
Indrapradja, I. S. (2020). Kajian Yuridis Terhadap Tanggung Jawab Direksi Dan Dewan Komisaris Pada Struktur Organisasi Perseroan Terbatas Yang Bersifat Kolegialitas Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 Tentang Perseroan Terbatas. Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Ilmu Administrasi.
Satya, A. W. (2022). PERTANGGUNG JAWABAN DIREKSI ATAS PERBUATAN HUKUM YANG TERJADI DALAM PERSEROAN TERBATAS DILIHAT DARI UNDANG–UNDANG NOMOR 40 TAHUN 2007. Meukuta Alam: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa, 4(1).
Sinaga, L. V., & Lestari, C. I. (2021). Analisis Yuridis Pertanggungjawaban Direksi Terhadap Pailitnya Suatu Perseroan Terbatas. JURNAL RECTUM: Tinjauan Yuridis Penanganan Tindak Pidana, 3(1).
Sakti, H. P., Siregar, G. T., & Rogers, M. (2022). AKIBAT HUKUM TERHADAP SUATU BADAN USAHA PERSEROAN TERBATAS YANG DINYATAKAN PAILIT. JURNAL PROINTEGRITA.
Buku
Hadi, S. (2021). Aspek Hukum Perseroan Terbatas dan Tanggung Jawab Direksi dalam Kepailitan. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.
Rahardjo, S. (2013). Dasar-Dasar Hukum Perusahaan di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press
Peraturan Perundang-Undangan
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 JURNAL ILMIAH NUSANTARA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
