Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Satpol PP Dalam Korban Penganiyaan Yang Dilakukan Oleh Oknum Buruh Pada Aksi Unjuk Rasa Kenaikan Upah Minimum Kota Surabaya (UMK)

Trixie Nadya Dwijayanti; Mega Dewi Ambarwati

doi:10.61722/jinu.v2i1.3305

Authors

Trixie Nadya Dwijayanti Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya
Mega Dewi Ambarwati Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61722/jinu.v2i1.3305

Keywords:

Public Order, Persecution, Demonstration

Abstract

Public Order is an important aspect in making progress into victory. To address this, an arrangement was established in the form of a Territorial Directive which is expected to play an important role in overcoming problems of collective agreement, and an institution or device was created that can assist the Territorial Head. in ensuring peace and harmony in the city of Surabaya. This article aims to provide legal direction that regulates legal security for victims. The cruel actions carried out by the intensifiers when carrying out demonstrations that occurred due to mishandling clearly indicate a failure or several violations of the framework, including human rights which were clearly controlled in several pre-existing directions. It asks about employment. This writing uses a normative juridical method with a conceptual and regulatory approach. The results of the writing show that the conclusion is that freezing every citizen, for individuals and non-individuals, can be a change from a country where the majority has power in social, state and state life and this has been directed at good legal structure and control. broadly and globally. This means that the state guarantees the right of every citizen to communicate conclusions or the life span of society in a safe, efficient, peaceful and peaceful manner, so that there can be no more acts of a cruel or oppressive nature. whether from its components. open society and also police officers.

References

A. D. Prasetyo, E. Supriyanto, and M. A. Saleh, “Analisis Yuridis Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Yang Menyebabkan Kematian (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat Nomor 111/PID.B/2021/PN.JKT.PST),” Deleg. Leg. Student Sci. J., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–24, 2022.

Y. Permana Saputra, G. Dwi Hendro Wibowo, and M. Risnain, “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Satpol Pp Honorer Dalam Bertugas Di Daerah,” J. Educ. Dev., vol. vol.8 No.2, no. 2, p. 480, 2020.

M. R. Reynaldi, “Daerah Di Kabupaten Kutai Kartanegara,” 1945.

A. S. Silangit, L. Furqoni, and F. Tanuwijaya, “Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Korban Penganiayaan yang Dilakukan oleh Oknum Polri Saat Aksi Demonstrasi,” Interdiscip. J. Law, Soc. Sci. Humanit., vol. 3, no. 1, p. 16, 2022, doi: 10.19184/idj.v3i1.29497.

M. D. Susanti, S. Harianto, and R. N. Setyowati, “Dehumanisasi penertiban Satpol PP pada pedagang kaki lima (Studi di Kawasan Gembong Asih Kota Surabaya),” J. Neo Soc., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 121–130, 2023.

“Cat ata n A khir Tahun LB H Surabaya2 019,” pp. 1–135.

Pemerintah Republik Indonesia, “Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 16 Tahun 2018 Tentang Satuan Polisi Pamong Praja,” Demogr. Res., pp. 4–7, 2020.