PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM DALAM TRANSAKSI NONTUNAI BERBASIS QUICK RESPONSE CODE INDONESIAN STANDARDS (QRIS) BERDASARKAN PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PERBANKAN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61722/jinu.v2i4.5030Keywords:
QRIS; digital payment; non-cash transactions; legal protection.Abstract
The Quick Response Indonesian Standard (QRIS) is the national standard for QR-Code-based payments, and it has been enforced by Bank Indonesia and ASPI beginning January 1, 2020. The industrial era 4.0 has brought about a considerable revolution in the payment system through the adoption of digital technologies. In order to facilitate the digitalization of payment systems and financial inclusion, particularly for Indonesia's MSME sector, this study intends to investigate legal protection in QRIS digital payment transactions. The UNGGUL concept (Universal, Easy, Profitable, and Direct) is used by QRIS to integrate different kinds of QR codes into a single system that makes non-cash transactions easier across a range of industries. But as society grows more reliant on digital payment methods, new legal issues and hazards arise that need for explicit consumer protection, data security, and service provider accountability. In order to provide a doctrinal perspective and implementation practices of regulations related to consumer protection in QRIS transactions, which require a strong legal basis and adequate protection mechanisms to ensure security and legal certainty for users, this study employs a normative legal method with a conceptual approach to analyze pertinent secondary legal materials, including government regulations, Bank Indonesia and OJK documents, and banking law literature.
References
Anisa, F. N., & Andraini, F. (2023). PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KONSUMEN DALAM TRANSAKSI MENGGUNAKAN SISTEM PEMBAYARAN BERBASIS QRIS (QUICK RESPONSE CODE INDONESIAN STANDARD). Jurnal Cahaya Mandalika, 4(2), 909–918.
Arsha Putra, I. P. R., & Yustiawan, D. G. P. (2022). Aspek Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Nasanah Atas Penyelenggaraan E-Payment Berbasis QR-Code. Kertha Wicaksana, 16(2), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.22225/kw.16.2.2022.99-107
Fridayani, & Cuaca, B. (2023). Transaksi Keuangan Digital Menggunakan Qris Ditinjau Dari Aspek Hukum. Teaching and Learning Journal of Mandalika, 4(2), 164–174. http://ojs.cahayamandalika.com/index.php/teacherAkreditasiSinta5,SK.Nomor:152/E/KPT/2023
Melynda Dwi Puspita. (2025). Daftar Negara yang Bisa Menggunakan QRIS, Jepang dan Cina Mulai 17 Agustus 2025. TEMPO.
Munawarsyah. (2024). Analisis Hukum Ekonomi Syariah terhadap Transaksi Paylater pada Aplikasi Shopee Munawarsyah1. 02(02), 89–102.
Rahayu, T. P. (2024). Analisis Perlindungan Hukum bagi Pelaku Usaha Penyedia Sistem Pembayaran Qris ( Quick Response Indonesian Standard ) berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999. 17. https://doi.org/10.30595/pssh.v17i.1169
Simanjuntak, B., Putri, A. P., & Syahidah, A. W. (2024). Efisiensi Penggunaan Quick Response Code Indonesia Standard ( QRIS ) Dalam Mendukung Penjualan Di Era Digital. 2(4), 332–340.
Sutrisno, E. (2024). Transaksi QRIS Melonjak 226,54%, Revolusi Pembayaran Digital di Indonesia. Indonesia.Go.Id.
Tara, I. K. K. B., & Sudiro, A. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum Konsumen Terhadap Pengguna Qris dan Penanganan Penipuan dalam Bertransaksi. UNES Law Review, 6(2), 4581–4588. https://review-unes.com/index.php/law/article/view/1498%0Ahttps://review-unes.com/index.php/law/article/download/1498/1212.
Widowati, N., & Khusaeni, M. (2022). Adopsi Pembayaran Digital Qris Pada Umkm Berdasarkan Technology Acceptance Model. Journal of Development Economic and Social Studies, 1(2), 325-347.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 JURNAL ILMIAH NUSANTARA

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.