Perubahan Peran Akuntan di Era Artificial Intelligence dan Robotic Process Automation: Kajian Literatur
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61722/jinu.v2i6.6625Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Robotic Process Automation, Accountant’s Role, Public Accounting Firm, AuditAbstract
The development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Robotic Process Automation (RPA) has had a substantial impact on the accounting profession, particularly within Public Accounting Firms. These technologies are capable of automating various administrative tasks and enhancing the speed and accuracy of data processing, which in turn shifts the accountant’s focus from routine activities to analysis and the provision of added value for clients. This study aims to describe the changing role of accountants in the context of AI and RPA implementation through a qualitative literature review approach. Data were collected from various reputable journals discussing the application of AI/RPA in auditing and accounting information systems. The findings indicate that AI and RPA offer advantages such as efficiency, improved audit quality, and opportunities for accountants to develop as strategic advisors. However, challenges including initial costs, human resource resistance, ethical concerns, and data security issues require serious attention. In conclusion, the successful adoption of AI and RPA in accounting practices requires accountants’ competency readiness, management support, and clear regulations so that technological transformation can enhance professionalism and the quality of audit services.
References
A. A. H. Abdullah and F. A. Almaqtari, “The impact of artificial intelligence and Industry 4.0 on transforming accounting and auditing practices,” J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex., vol. 10, no. 1, p. 100218, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100218.
J. Kokina, S. Blanchette, T. H. Davenport, and D. Pachamanova, “Challenges and opportunities for artificial intelligence in auditing: Evidence from the field,” Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst., vol. 56, no. April 2024, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.accinf.2025.100734.
N. T. T. Binh, “Transforming Auditing in the AI Era: A Comprehensive Review,” Inf., vol. 16, no. 5, 2025, doi: 10.3390/info16050400.
D. Argento, D. Dobija, G. Grossi, M. Marrone, and L. Mora, “The unaccounted effects of digital transformation: implications for accounting, auditing and accountability research,” Accounting, Audit. Account. J., vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 765–796, 2025, doi: 10.1108/AAAJ-01-2025-7670.
N. Kroon, M. Do Céu Alves, and I. Martins, “The impacts of emerging technologies on accountants’ role and skills: Connecting to open innovation-a systematic literature review,” J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex., vol. 7, no. 3, 2021, doi: 10.3390/joitmc7030163.
J. Pargmann, E. Riebenbauer, D. Flick-Holtsch, and F. Berding, “Digitalisation in accounting: a systematic literature review of activities and implications for competences,” Empir. Res. Vocat. Educ. Train., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1–37, 2023, doi: 10.1186/s40461-023-00141-1.
W. Wulandari, U. Nurfagfira, A. S. Desfana, and H. Manurung, “Robotic Process Automation in Auditing: A Systematic Review,” J. Ilm. Manaj. Kesatuan, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 747–752, 2023.
L. Indonesia, Editorial : Dr . Aida Nahar , SE , M . Si , CA ., no. 061.
S. Leitner-Hanetseder, O. M. Lehner, C. Eisl, and C. Forstenlechner, “A profession in transition: actors, tasks and roles in AI-based accounting,” J. Appl. Account. Res., vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 539–556, 2021, doi: 10.1108/JAAR-10-2020-0201.
A. Fedyk, J. Hodson, N. Khimich, and T. Fedyk, “Is artificial intelligence improving the audit process?,” Rev. Account. Stud., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 938–985, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11142-022-09697-x.
P. Kraus, E. Fißler, and D. Schlegel, “A typology of challenges in the context of robotic process automation implementation projects,” Int. J. Organ. Anal., vol. 32, no. 11, pp. 60–73, 2024, doi: 10.1108/IJOA-11-2023-4100.
O. M. Lehner, K. Ittonen, H. Silvola, E. Ström, and A. Wührleitner, “Artificial intelligence based decision-making in accounting and auditing: ethical challenges and normative thinking,” Accounting, Audit. Account. J., vol. 35, no. 9, pp. 109–135, 2022, doi: 10.1108/AAAJ-09-2020-4934.
D. Leocádio, L. Malheiro, and J. C. G. dos Reis, “Auditors in the digital age: a systematic literature review,” Digit. Transform. Soc., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 5–20, 2025, doi: 10.1108/DTS-02-2024-0014.
J. Laine, M. Minkkinen, and M. Mäntymäki, “Ethics-based AI auditing: A systematic literature review on conceptualizations of ethical principles and knowledge contributions to stakeholders,” Inf. Manag., vol. 61, no. 5, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.im.2024.103969.
M. Kureljusic and E. Karger, “Forecasting in financial accounting with artificial intelligence – A systematic literature review and future research agenda,” J. Appl. Account. Res., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 81–104, 2024, doi: 10.1108/JAAR-06-2022-0146.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 JURNAL ILMIAH NUSANTARA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
