A Semantic Analysis of Referential and Contextual Meaning in the Song Lose You to Love Me by Selena Gomez

Authors

  • Thamrin Daulat Dorianus Simanjuntak Universitas HKBP Nommensen Pematang Siantar
  • Bernieke Anggita Ristia Damanik Universitas HKBP Nommensen Pematang Siantar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61722/jinu.v3i3.9912

Keywords:

semantics, referential meaning, contextual meaning, song lyrics, analysis

Abstract

This study aims to analyze referential and contextual meanings in the song Lose You to Love Me performed by Selena Gomez. This research employs a qualitative descriptive method to examine how meaning is constructed within song lyrics. Referential meaning refers to the direct relationship between words and real-world entities, while contextual meaning is influenced by emotional, situational, and experiential factors. The data were collected from the official lyrics of the song and analyzed using semantic theories proposed by George Yule and Geoffrey Leech. The findings indicate that contextual meaning is more dominant than referential meaning. Many expressions in the lyrics are metaphorical and reflect emotional experiences such as heartbreak, self-reflection, and personal growth. The study concludes that understanding song lyrics requires contextual interpretation beyond literal meaning.

References

G. Yule, The Study of Language, 6th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.

J. Cutting, Pragmatics and Discourse, 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 2020. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315835976

D. Crystal, The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language, 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.

N. Fairclough, Language and Power, 3rd ed. London: Routledge, 2021. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003167457

V. Evans, Cognitive Linguistics: A Complete Guide, 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2019.

A. Wierzbicka, Semantics: Primes and Universals, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198841357.001.0001

J. R. Martin and D. Rose, Working with Discourse, 3rd ed. London: Bloomsbury, 2021. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350064101

T. A. van Dijk, “Discourse and Context: A Sociocognitive Approach,” Discourse Studies, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 120–135, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445620968123

M. Halliday and C. Matthiessen, Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar, 4th ed. London: Routledge, 2021. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315413891

P. Stockwell, Cognitive Poetics, 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 2020. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315794006

S. Hunston and G. Thompson, Evaluation in Text, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199260881.001.0001

R. Carter, Language and Creativity, London: Routledge, 2020. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315846415

B. Paltridge, Discourse Analysis, 3rd ed. London: Bloomsbury, 2021. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350156097

K. Allan, The Meaning of Language, London: Routledge, 2020. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003020233

J. Saeed, Semantics, 4th ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118430163

D. Schiffrin, Approaches to Discourse, Oxford: Blackwell, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118931448

E. Semino, “Metaphor in Discourse,” Language and Literature, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947019895209

L. Cameron, “Metaphor and Talk,” Discourse Studies, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 245–260, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445619893733

J. Charteris-Black, Analysing Political Speeches, London: Palgrave, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137333858

S. Mills, Discourse, 3rd ed. London: Routledge, 2020. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003008545

Downloads

Published

2026-05-06

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 3 (2026): Mei

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 JURNAL ILMIAH NUSANTARA

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.