ANALISIS MASALAH PENILAIAN HASIL BELAJAR DENGAN PENDEKATAN TEORI KOGNITIF DAN KONSTRUKTIF

Authors

  • Sabrina Jihan Salsabilla Program Studi Pendidikan Tata Rias, Fakultas Program Studi Di Luar Kampus Utama, Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • M. Mamduh Winangun Program Studi Pendidikan Tata Rias, Fakultas Program Studi Di Luar Kampus Utama, Universitas Negeri Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61722/jinu.v3i3.9994

Keywords:

learning outcomes assessment, cognitive theory, constructivism, HOTS, education

Abstract

This study investigates the difficulties in assessing educational learning outcomes through cognitive and constructivist theoretical frameworks. It uses a qualitative case study method and looks at secondary data from academic journals, education reports, statistics, and news sources. The main findings show that traditional assessment systems, which focus on final products, don't do a good job of measuring students' advanced thinking skills and deep understanding of concepts. According to learning theory, behaviorism encourages score-driven motivation through reinforcement, cognitivism emphasizes process-oriented cognitive evaluation, and constructivism requires tools to evaluate learners' independent knowledge construction. So, solutions include using real-world methods like projects, portfolios, and Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) tests, along with teaching that focuses on the student. So, assessments of learning outcomes should lead to deeper, more meaningful learning and raise the overall level of education.

References

Astusi, R. S. (2024). Implementasi teori belajar behaviorisme dan humanisme dalam pembelajaran. Jurnal Literasi Pendidikan Indonesia.

Bustomi, A., Hidayat, T., & Lestari, S. (2024). Penerapan teori kognitif Piaget dalam meningkatkan pemahaman konsep siswa. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 8(2), 112–120

Habsy, B. A., Zakirah, A., Rahmah, M. A., Nafisah, C. A., & Surabaya, U. N. (2023). O f a h. 4, 326–342.

Handoyo, R., & Ani, M. (2025). Pembelajaran konstruktivisme dalam meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kinerja, 6(1), 23–34.

Jean, K. (2024). Journal of Education and Teaching Review, Volume 7 Number 4, 2024 | 16376. 7, 16376–16383.

Nurhuda, H., Tinggi, S., & Islam, A. (n.d.). FACTORS AND SOLUTIONS OFFERED BY NATIONAL EDUCATION PROBLEMS; FACTORS AND SOLUTIONS. 127–137.

OECD. (2023). The state of learning and equilty in education. Paris : OECD Publishing.

Rahmawati, L., Prasetyo, B., & Kurniawan, A. (2021). Efektivitas discovery learning dalam meningkatkan pemahaman konsep siswa. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan, 5(2), 89–98.

Sansena, M. A. (n.d.). THE APPLICATION OF THE MATHEMATICS LEARNING PROCESS IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH JEAN PIAGET'S THEORY OF COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT. 39–46.

Slametno. (2015). Belajar dan faktor faktor yang mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta

Slavin, R. E. (2018). Educational psychology: Theory and practice. Boston: Pearson education.

Statistics, C. b. (2024). Indonesia education statistics. Jakarta : BPS.

Tohari, B., & Rahman, A. (2024). Peran interaksi sosial dalam pembelajaran perspektif Vygotsky. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 9(1), 55–63.

Wardani, I. R., Immama, M., Zuani, P., & Kholis, N. (n.d.). Lev Vygotsky's theory of cognitive development learning and its implications in learning. Sec. 4.

Witasari, D. (2024). Analisis teori belajar kognitivisme dalam pembelajaran modern. Jurnal Basic Education.

Zawacki Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2022). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), 1–27.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-11

Issue

Section

Articles