Pelayanan Administrasi Terpadu Di Kecamatan Pasangkayu Kabupaten Pasangkayu

Authors

  • Susriani Susriani UNIVERSITAS TADULAKO
  • Suasa Suasa UNIVERSITAS TADULAKO
  • Nawawi Natsir UNIVERSITAS TADULAKO

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61722/jirs.v1i4.1052

Keywords:

Reliability, Responsiveness, Assurance, Empathy, Direct evidence

Abstract

The aim of this research is to determine Integrated Administrative Services in Pasangkayu District, Pasangkayu Regency, which is studied based on the work motivation theory model according to Parasuraman (1988: 69). Reliability (Reliability), Responsiveness (Responsiveness), Assurance (Guarantee), Empathy (Empathy), Tangible (Direct evidence), The type of research used is qualitative descriptive with purposive selection of informants and the number of informants selected is 5 people using data collection techniques, 1). Observation, 2). Interview, 3) Documentation. By analyzing all the interview results. Results of Research on Integrated Administrative Services in Pasangkayu District, Pasangkayu Regency, Based on the results of the discussion using 5 (Five) Service Quality indicators for integrated administrative services at the Pasangkayu District Office, Pasangkayu Regency, the author can draw the conclusion that the results of the research conducted by the author in the Pasangkayu District Office, Pasangkayu Regency through observation and the results of direct interviews with several informants, from five dimensions/aspects of assessment of Reliability, Responsiveness, Assurance, Empathy, Tangible (direct evidence). The author concludes that the implementation of government public services in the Pasangkayu District office, Pasangkayu Regency, is measured from the five indicators, which are assessed as indicators/dimensions of Reliability,Responsiveness,Empathy,Tangible (Direct Evidence), whereas in Assurance indicators/dimensions whose results are still not working well

References

Batinggi, A., 1998. Manajemen Pelayanan Umum. Bahan Kuliah STIA LAN. Jakarta.

Dwiyanto, Agus et al. 2007”Reformasi Tata Pemerintahan dan Otonomi

Daerah Pusat Studi Kependudukan dan Kebijakan”. Universitas Gajah Mada, Yogyakarta.

Ibnu Hadjar. 1996.”Dasar-dasar Metodologi Penelitian Kwantitatif dalam Pendidikan”. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Indriantoro, nurdan Supomo, bambang (1999).Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis Untuk Akuntansi & Manajemen. Yogyakarta : Penerbit BPFE.

Kumorotomo, Wahyudi, 2008.”Akuntabilitas Birokrasi Publik Sketsa Pada Masa Transisi”. Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta.

Lukman, Sampara. 2000. Manajemen kualitas pelayanan. Jakarta: STIA LAN Press.

Gasperz, Vincent. 2006. Manjemen Kualitas; Penerapan Konsep-konsep kualitas Dalam Manajemen Bisnis. Jakarta. Yayasan Indonesia Emas

Gramedia Pustaka Utama

Miles dan Huberman 2007, “Analisis Data Kualitatif”. Jakarta, Universitas Indonesia

Moenir H.A.S. 2006. Manajemen Pelayanan Umum. Bumi Aksara. Jakarta.

Parasuraman, A. & L.L. Berry. 1998. A.. Marketing Services: Competing Through Quality. Sedarmayanti, 2009, Reformasi Administrasi Publik, Reformasi Birokrasi dan

Kepemimpinan Masa Depan; Mewujudkan Pelayanan dan Kepemerintahan Yang Baik, Rafika Aditama. Bandung

Sinambela. 2010. Reformasi pelayanan Publik. Jakarta; Bumi Aksara. Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah

Undang-Undang Nomor 25 Tahun 2009 tentang Pelayanan Publik Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 2014 tentang Aparatur Sipil Negara

Keputusan Menteri Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara Nomor 63 Tahun 2003 Tentang Pedoman Umum Penyelenggaraan Pelayanan Publik.

Downloads

Published

2024-02-29

Issue

Section

Articles