Pengaruh Organizational Trust, Empowering Leadership, Psychological Safety Dan Group Conflict

Authors

  • Ade Nur Sitta Dewi Universitas Esa Unggul
  • Lia Amalia Universitas Esa Unggul

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61722/jirs.v1i4.1149

Keywords:

Empowering Leadership, Group Conflict, Organizational Trust, Psychological Safety.

Abstract

In a knowledge-based economy, employees' perceptions of psychological safety in their work units are critical to group conflict This study aims to test and analyze how the influence of organization trust, epowering leadership, psychological safety and group conflict as mediating variables in retail companies in Jakarta The population in this study is employees or employees in retail companies consisting of staff consignment levels, as many as 150 respondents who come from employees or employees of permanent worker status and employees or employees of contract status with a service period of more than one year. Measurement techniques that use data collection tools in the form of questionnaires with online dissemination methods. Data analysis method using SEM (Structural Equitation Model). which is operated through the Smarts (Partial Least Square) program. The results showed that the variable of organization trust in psychological safety through group conflict showed that the value wssas positive. situations where psychological safety is well created in the workplace. Team members feel comfortable talking openly about the issues they're facing and asking questions when they need help. Leaders tend to create strong relationships with their team members, getting to know them as individuals, especially their work style, preferred working hours, strengths, areas of development and important commitments outside of work.

References

Abbasi, A., & Wan Ismail, W. K. (2023). Linking organizational citizenship behavior and organizational trust towards reducing workplace deviance behavior in higher education. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2022.2157538

Akins, E. E., Giddens, E., Glassmeyer, D., Gruss, A., Hedden, M. K., Slinger-Friedman, V., & Weand, M. (2019). Sustainability education and organizational change: A critical case study of barriers and change drivers at a higher education institution. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020501

Ayu, T., & Wulandari, R. (2017). Kinerja Karyawan Yang Ditinjau Dari Budaya, Gaya Kepemimpinan Dan Komunikasi Di Kementerian Riset, Teknologi Dan Pendidikan Tinggi Republik Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi Universitas Esa Unggul, 8(01), 77940.

Budiarto, Y. (2006). Social Psychological Dimensions of Conflict. Social Psychological Dimensions of Conflict Jurnal Psikologi, 4(2), 88.

Eun KIM, J. (2021). Paradoxical Leadership and Proactive Work Behavior: The Role of Psychological Safety in the Hotel Industry*. Journal of Asian Finance, 8(5), 167–0178. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no5.0167

Gharaveis, A., Hamilton, D. K., & Pati, D. (2018). The Impact of Environmental Design on Teamwork and Communication in Healthcare Facilities: A Systematic Literature Review. Health Environments Research and Design Journal, 11(1), 119–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/1937586717730333

Gumennykova, T. (2023). Analysis of trends in pedagogy and psychology: implementation of globalization solutions. Futurity Education, 3, 52–75. https://doi.org/10.57125/fed.2023.06.25.04

Hair Jr., J. F., Gabriel, M. L. D. da S., & Patel, V. K. (2014). Modelagem de Equações Estruturais Baseada em Covariância (CB-SEM) com o AMOS: Orientações sobre a sua aplicação como uma Ferramenta de Pesquisa de Marketing. Revista Brasileira de Marketing, 13(2), 44–55. https://doi.org/10.5585/remark.v13i2.2718

Harvey, J. F., Johnson, K. J., Roloff, K. S., & Edmondson, A. C. (2019). From orientation to behavior: The interplay between learning orientation, open-mindedness, and psychological safety in team learning. Human Relations, 72(11), 1726–1751. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718817812

Huff, L., & Kelley, L. (2003). Levels of organizational trust in individualist versus collectivist societies: A seven-nation study. Organization Science, 14(1), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.14.1.81.12807

Jehn, K. A., & Bendersky, C. (2003). Intragroup Conflict in Organizations: a Contingency Perspective on the Conflict-Outcome Relationship. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25(03), 187–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(03)25005-X

Jehn, K. A., & Mannix, E. A. (2001). The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 238–251. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069453

Jones, J., Abieta, A. J., Murray, S. R., & Bell, M. (2023). An investigatory research on organizational trust and its relationship with job satisfaction and psychological contract breach. Administrative Issues Journal: Education, Practice, and Research, 13(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.5929/2023.13.1.1

Joo, B. K. (Brian), Yoon, S. K., & Galbraith, D. (2023). The effects of organizational trust and empowering leadership on group conflict: psychological safety as a mediator. Organization Management Journal, 20(1), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.1108/OMJ-07-2021-1308

Jr., J. F. H., Matthews, L. M., Matthews, R. L., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: updated guidelines on which method to use. International Journal of Multivariate Data Analysis, 1(2), 107. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijmda.2017.087624

Lin, M., Zhang, X., Ng, B. C. S., & Zhong, L. (2020). To Empower or Not to Empower? Multilevel Effects of Empowering Leadership on Knowledge Hiding. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 89(April), 102540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102540

Martins, L. L., Schilpzand, M. C., Kirkman, B. L., Ivanaj, S., & Ivanaj, V. (2013). A Contingency View of the Effects of Cognitive Diversity on Team Performance: The Moderating Roles of Team Psychological Safety and Relationship Conflict. Small Group Research, 44(2), 96–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496412466921

Orsini, C., & Rodrigues, V. (2020). Supporting motivation in teams working remotely: The role of basic psychological needs. Medical Teacher, 42(7), 828–829. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1758305

Power, N., Alcock, J., Philpot, R., & Levine, M. (2023). The psychology of interoperability: A systematic review of joint working between the UK emergency services. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, February, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12469

Salanova, M., Acosta-Antognoni, H., Llorens, S., & Blanc, P. Le. (2021). We trust you! a multilevel-multireferent model based on organizational trust to explain performance. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18084241

Septyanto, D., & Dewanto, I. D. (2018). Pengukuran Kinerja Intelektual Kapital Pada Dosen Tetap. Jurnal Ekonomi Volume 9 Nomor 1, Mei 2018, 9, 1.

Sherf, E. N., Parke, M. R., & Isaakyan, S. (2018). Distinguishing Voice and Silence at Work : Unique Relationships with Perceived Impact , Psychological Safety , Distinguishing Voice and Silence at Work : Unique Relationships with Perceived Impact , Psychological Safety , and Burnout Elad_Sherf@kenan-flag. Academy of Management Journal, 1–70.

Su, T. S., Chen, C., Cui, X., Yang, C., & Ma, W. (2020). Consistency at different levels: A meta-analytic examination of organizational trust and performance. Nankai Business Review International, 11(4), 537–567. https://doi.org/10.1108/NBRI-01-2020-0005

Tjahjono, B., Muhtar, M., & Abdullah, T. (2020). The Effect of Transformational Leadership , Organizational Culture , and Innovation on Lecturers Performance at Esaunggul University , 2019. Icels 2019, 82–90. https://doi.org/10.5220/0008994200820090

Turesky, E. F., Smith, C. D., & Turesky, T. K. (2020). A call to action for virtual team leaders: practitioner perspectives on trust, conflict and the need for organizational support. Organization Management Journal, 17(4–5), 185–206. https://doi.org/10.1108/OMJ-09-2019-0798

Downloads

Published

2024-03-30

Issue

Section

Articles