Perlindungan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual di Era Digital: Studi Kasus Sengketa Merek PS Glow dan MS Glow

Authors

  • Amira Atsil Abigael Wegni Universitas Tidar
  • Novi Wulan Suci Universitas Tidar
  • Ulfa Kurnia Sari Universitas Tidar
  • Tabina Belinda Putri Universitas Tidar
  • Citra Hayu Khatintri Universitas Tidar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61722/jirs.v1i5.1354

Keywords:

Dispute, IPR Protection, Brand

Abstract

The dispute over a brand involving MS Glow and PS Glow in 2023 is a trademark dispute that occurs due to similarities in the name of the trademark with another brand, so it is also called a copy of another trademark that has been registered with the Directorate General of Intellectual Property, so it can be said violates the first to file principle. In connection with this, this article examines the ongoing dispute between MS Glow and PS Glow in a complex and in-depth manner regarding the dispute resolution process related to the use of trademarks and forms of legal protection for PS Glow which are reviewed using the system followed by the Indonesian state. to files. This research is included in normative juridical research carried out through a statutory regulation approach. The findings of this study indicated that mediation was not a successful resolution method, so efforts continued through an arbitration body. Through arbitration, MS Glow has been proven to have committed brand infringement and paid damages to PS Glow. The first to file principle in trademarks stipulates that the first trademark registration has priority, and the importance of registering a trademark in accordance with the relevant product class is to prevent related legal disputes. The trademark dispute case between MS Glow and PS Glow shows the importance of registering a trademark correctly and in accordance with regulations to guarantee exclusive rights to the trademark.

References

Dr. Yulia, SH, MH, Hak Atas Kekayaan Intelektual, Lhokseumawe: Unimal Press, 2015, hlm. 12.

EntasarI, D., Arjuna, H., & Nuraini, L. (2023). Analisa Yuridis Kepastian Hukum Dalam Putusan Hakim Terhadap Sengketa Merek Antara PS GLOW dan MS GLOW (Studi

Putusan Nomor 2/PDT. SUS. HKI/MEREK/2022/PN. Niaga SBY dan Putusan Nomor 2/PDT. SUS. HKI/MEREK/2022/PN. Niaga MDN) (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji).

Kholis Roisah, “Implementasi Perjanjian TRIPs Tentang Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Hak Atas Merek Terkenal (Asing) Di Indonesia”, Tesis, (Tidak diterbitkan, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro (UNDIP), Semarang, 2001), hlm. 66.

Nasional, B.P.H., & RI, K.H.D.H. Laporan Akhir Naskah Akademik Peraturan

Perundang-Undangan Rancangan Undang-Undang Tentang Hak Kekayaan Industri (Paket Perubahan UU NO. 31 Tahun 2000 Tentang Desain Industri)

Ranti Fauza Mayana, Perlindungan Desain Industri di Indonesia, Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia, Jakarta, 2004, Hal. 44.

Sudaryat, Hak Kekayaan Intelektual, Oase Media, Bandung, 2010, hal. 68.

Sukalandri, Ni Wayan. Sengketa Plagiasi Merek Dagang MS Glow dan PS Glow. 2023. Jurnal Analogi Hukum.

Yanti, Novi. Penyelesaian Sengketa Merek PS Glow Melawan MS Glow Berdasarkan Undang-Undang No. 30 Tahun 1999 Tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa. 2022. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahan Pendidikan.

Zalfa, A.N., Ruhtiani, M., Afrilies, M.H., (2023). “ANALISIS PUTUSAN NOMOR: 02/PDT.SUS.HKI/MEREK/2022/PN NIAGA SBY TENTANG SENGKETA MEREK DAGANG ANTARA MS GLOW DAN PS GLOW DIHUBUNGKAN DENGAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 20 TAHUN 2016 TENTANG MEREK DAN INDIKASI GEOGRAFIS”, Universitas Harapan Bangsa

Downloads

Published

2024-05-18

Issue

Section

Articles