THE EFFECT OF SMALL GROUP DISCUSSION TEACHING METHOD TO THE READING COMPREHENSION OF GRADE EIGHT STUDENTS OF SMP NEGERI 4 PEMATANG SIANTAR ON A DESCRIPTIVE TEXT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61722/jirs.v1i2.170Keywords:
Effect, Reading, Comprehension, Small Group Discussion, Descriptive TextAbstract
The purpose of this study is to find out whether the effect of small group discussion teaching method to the reading comprehension of grade eight students of SMP Negeri 4 Pematang Siantar. This research uses quantitative research with a quasi-experimental research methodology. Creswell (2012:27),explains that "quasi-experimental includes giving tasks, but not assigning participants to groups". This research used quantitative research quasi-experimental method. The data from this study where collected and obtained through tests. The sample this research the VIII -6 as the experimental class and the VIII-9 as the control class .the test was carried out with pre-test and post-test to students using small group discussion teaching method.The research data and result findings of calculation, the research found the mean score in experimental class from pre-test to post-test are 70.40 and 82.40. than score in control class from pre-test and post-test are 70.53 and 76.73. the statistical hypothesis testing findings sample t-test are indicated ,at a level of significance of 5% (=0,05), that the t -test was 3,04 whereas t-table was 1.671 , or t-test> t-table .it can be concluded that the value of t-test was higher than the value of t-table .therefore, the alternative hypothesis (Ha) was accepted and the Null Hypothesis (Ho) was rejected .so, its mean that there is a significant effect of use small group discussion teaching method to the reading comprehension of grade eight students of SMP Negeri 4 Pematang Siantar
References
Adhini 2017, reading is a gainful action since students get the data from the content as well as can expand their English capacity by implication. Vol 7, No 1 (2013) DOI. https://garuda.kemdikbud.go.id/documents/detail/1551135
Ahmad S, C. (2013). The Effectiveness of Small Group Discussion Method in Teaching Reading (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia).
Ahmad, S. C. (2013). The effectiveness of small group discussion method inteaching reading at second grade students’ one of public junior high school. (Unpublished Undergraduate Thesis.) Indonesia University of Education ,Bandung.
Alexander J. Estillin, Abdullah. (2008). Teaching Reading .Makassar : UNM
Angkasa, 1985.
Ary, Donal. "Jacobs. LC, & Sorensen, C.(2010)." Introduction to research in education 8.
Bamanti, Ikhsan & Oktaviani, Dwi, R. (2011). Ringkasan Teori & Evaluasi
bahasa inggris SMA/MA, Jakarta: Grasindo Vol. 2, No. 1, (February, 2023
p.122-131DOI. :///C:/Users/Personal/Downloads/43949-108582-1-SM.pdf
Brown, D.(2004:11). Language assessment: Principle and classroom practice. New . Vol. 6, No. 2 doi:10.5296/jse.v6i2.9201
Brown, (2011) Small Group Discussion Method is A Group Which Consists of Six
or Fewer Students Who are Assigned A Task That Involves Collaboration
Vol. 8, No. 4 doi:10.5296/jse.v8i2.9201
Brown, H. Douglas. (2004). Language assessment, (US America : Person
Education,2004).DOI.https://eprints.iainsurakarta.ac.id/6748/1/SKRIPSI%20SAYEKTI%20DWI%20SAFITRI%20FIX.pdf
Brown DH. Language Assessment Principles and Classroom Practices. New York: Pearson Education; 2004:311
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed
Crown Press Inc, 1997)December 22th, 2019)
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed
Methods Approaches 4th Ed. London: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Cresswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and
Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Reseach. Los Angeles: Pearson
Publication.DOI. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eej
Carrell, P. (1998). Interactive Text Processing: Implications for esl/second Language Reading Classrooms.
Carrell, J. Devine & D. Eskey, (eds.), Interactive Approaches to Second Languagereading(pp.7392).cuesta.edu/student/resources/ssc/study_guides/reading_comp/302_read_levels.html
Devira, M. (2017). The Reading Comprehension Problems Faced by English Department
Devira, M. D. (2017). The Reading Comprehension Problems Faced by English Department Students of Syiah Kuala University. SEUNEUBOK LADA: Jurnal ilmu-ilmu Sejarah, Sosial, Budaya dan Kependidikan, 4(1), 38-45.
Duke and Pearson. (2003;230). Reading Comprehension Strategies that Work. Michigan: University of Michigan.
Duke, N. K. (2011). What research has to say about reading instruction.Newark,
Duke, Nell K., and P. David Pearson. "Effective Practices for Developing Reading Comprehension." Journal of education 189.1-2 (2009): 107-122.Education Company: 2000), p. 4.Edulanguage, 7(1), 1-9.
Douglas Brown, Teaching principles. P. Ed Australia, (2015),185Ernest W. Brewer, Proven Ways to Get Your Message Across, (United States of America: evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle
Edisherashvili, N. (2014). Communicative Language Teaching in Georgia: Froem Theory to Practice. Leiden University.
Frankel, Martin R., et al. "Suppl 1: a probability sample for monitoring the HIV-infected population in care in the US and in selected states." The open AIDS journal 6 (2012): 67.
Fink, Lila. et al. (1983). Choices a Text for Writing and Reading. New York:
Little Brown and Company Limited.
Fimbriani, Siti Cholifah. 2016. The Use of Teaching Media Powtoon to Improve
Eleventh of Language Class Students Writing Ability at SMA Negeri 1
Malang Penulis. Vol. 2, No. 1, (February, 2023), p. 122-131DOI
file:///C:/Users/Personal/Downloads/43949-108582-1-SM%20(2).pdf
Gerot L., & Wignell P. (1994:208). Making Sense Of Functional Grammar.
Sydney: 13.4324/9781315726274
Gerot and Wignell. 1994.Making Sense of Functional Grammar. Cammeray
NSW: GerdStabler Volume 7 No. 4 DOI.2302-3198
Goodman, Kenneth S. "The reading process." Encyclopedia of Language and Education: Literacy. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, (1997. 1-7).
M. A. Britt, S. R. Goldman, & J.-F. Rouet (Eds.), Reading: From words to
multiple texts (pp. 132-146). New York, NY: Routledge. Vol. 3(1) 62–69
DOI: 10.1177/2372732215624707 bbs.sagepub.com
Grabe, William and Stoller, Fredericka.(2002:29).Teaching and Researching
Reading,.Britain:Pearson Education.Grabe and DOI:10.4324/9781315726274
Grabeand Stoller. (2013:29). Teaching and researching reading. New york.
Routledge. DOI:10.4324/9781315726274
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 JURNAL ILMIAH RESEARCH STUDENT
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
