Pengaruh Greedy, Opportunity, Need Dan Exposure Terhadap Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik Mahasiswa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61722/jirs.v1i1.25Keywords:
Greedy, Opportunity, Need, Exposure, Cheating behaviorAbstract
This research aims to determine the influence of greed, opportunity, need and exposure on student academic cheating behavior. This research uses a quantitative survey research method with an explanatory research design. The population in this study were active students from the Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Siliwangi University class of 2020, totaling 1289 students. The sample collection technique used Proportional Random Sampling, and the sample size was 305 respondents. Data collection methods use questionnaires and data analysis techniques use multiple linear regression analysis, partial and simultaneous hypothesis testing. Based on the results of data processing, it was found that greedy did not have a significant effect on students' academic cheating behavior. Opportunity has a significant effect on academic cheating behavior. Need has a significant effect on academic cheating behavior. Exposure has no effect on academic cheating behavior. Then greedy, opportunity, need and exposure have a significant effect on students' academic cheating behavior.
References
Annisa, R.T., & Halmawati, H. (2020). Pengaruh Elemen Fraud Diamond Theory Terhadap Financial Statement Fraud. Jurnal Eksploraso Akuntansi, 2(1), 2263-2279
Asih, T. (2020). Pengaruh greed, Opportunity, Need, dan Exposure terhadap kecurangan akademik dengan religiusitas sebagai variabel moderating (Studi Empiris pada Mahasiswa Pendidikan Ekonomi Universitas Negeri Semarang Angkatan 2016-2018). 1–263.
Buana, Z. P., & Soetjiningsih, C. H. (2020). Penalaran Moral Dan Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik Mahasiswa Yang Sedang Mengerjakan Skripsi. Jurnal Psikologi Perseptual, 4(1), 65. https://doi.org/10.24176/perseptual.v4i1.2271
Budiman, N. (2018). Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik Mahasiswa: Dimensi Fraud Diamond dan Gone theori. Akuntabilitas: Jurnal Ilmu Akuntansi, 11(1), 75-90.
Christiana, A., Kristiani, A., & Pangestu, S. (2021). Kecurangan Pembelajaran Daring Pada Awal Pandemi: Dimensi Fraud Pentagon. Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi Indonesia, 19(1), 66–83. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpai.v19i1.40734
Fenti, Astrina., Nina, S., Mohammad, A, A., & Hesti, A. (2022). Pengaruh Dimensi Fraud Triangle Terhadap Kecurangan Akademik (Studi Kasus Pada Mahasiswa FEB Universitas Muhammadiyah Palembang). Jurnal Media Wahana Ekonomika, 19(2), 257-271.
Fitri, M., Nurhayani, U., & Sibarani, C. G. (2021). Pengaruh Pressure Terhadap Perilaku Kecuranganak Ademik Pada Mahasiswa Fakultas Ekonomi Programstudi Pendidikan Akuntansi Universitas Negeri Medan. JAKPI - Jurnal Akuntansi, Keuangan & Perpajakan Indonesia, 9(1), 73. https://doi.org/10.24114/jakpi.v9i1.25708
Gultom, S. A., & Safrida, E. (2020). Analisis Pengaruh Fraud Diamond dan Gone theori terhadap Academic Fraud (Studi Kasus Mahasiswa Akuntansi Se Sumatera Utara). Jurnal EKSIS, 9(3), 113–127.
Indrawati, G, A, P,S., I Gusti, A, P., dan Ananta, W, T.,(2017) Pengaruh Greed, Opportunity, Need, Exposure Terhadap Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik Pada Mahasiswa Akuntansi Program S1 Negeri Di Bali. Jurnal Akuntansi Program S1, 8(2), 1-11.
Iskandar., Askar, J., Rini, W., Zaini. (2022). Statistik Pendidikan (Teori Dan Aplikasi SPSS). Pekalongan: NEM
Izhar, Azhari, A., M.Ahkam, A., Nurfitrianty, F., (2022). Prokrastinasi dan Kecurangan Akademik pada Mahasiswa. Jurnal Psikologu Talenta Mahasiswa, 1(4), 183-195
Kristianti, I., & Setyawan, D. D. (2021). Determinan Niat Kecurangan Akademik Dengan Menggunakan Fraud Triangle. COSTING: Journal of Economic, Business and Accounting, 5(1), 647–657.
Munirah, A., & Nurkin, A. (2018). Pengaruh Faktor-Faktor Fraud Diamond dan Gone theori Terhadap Kecurangan Akademik. Economic Education Analysis Journal, 7(1), 120–139.
Mustari & Taufiq. (2012). Pengantar Metode Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Laksbang Pressindo
Neva, S., & Amyar, F. (2021). Pengaruh Fraud Diamond dan Gonetheory Terhadap Academic Fraud. JAS-PT (Jurnal Analisis Sistem Pendidikan Tinggi Indonesia), 5(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.36339/jaspt.v5i1.408
Nizarul Alim, M., & Resa Fachrizi, A. (2021). Students Academic Fraud Behaviour A Gone Fraud Theory Explanation of Indonesian Students’ Exam Fraud. Quest Journals Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Science, 9(2), 2321–9467. www.questjournals.org
Ridpath, B. D., Gurney, G., & Snyder, E. (2015). NCAA Academic Fraud Cases and Historical Consistency: A Comparative Content Analysis. Journal of Legal Aspects of Sport, 25(2), 75–103. https://doi.org/10.1123/jlas.2014-0021
Rizka, Ariyanti, R., (2022). Perbedaan Kecurangan Akademis Siswa SMA Ditinjau Dari Jenis Kelamin Dan Jurusan Sekolah. Jurnal Psikologi Konseling, 20(1). 1356-1366.
Setiawan, D. F. (2016). Analisis Kecurangan Akademik Melalui Rubrik Penskoranpada Kajian Masalah Ekonomi. PROMOSI (Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi), 4(2), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.24127/ja.v4i2.634
Siyoto.S., dan Ali Sodik. (2015). Dasar Metodologi Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Literasi Media Publishing.
alib, D. C., & Kusumawati, A. (2020). The Influence of Fraud Diamond Theory and Gone theori of Fraud at Hospital of Dr . Tadjuddin Chalid Makassar. IOSR Journal of Economics and Finance (IOSR-JEF), 11(6), 47–52. https://doi.org/10.9790/5933-1106044752
Zaini, M., Anita C., & Achdiar, R, S. (2015). Analisis pengaruh Fraud Diamond & Gone theori Terhadap Academic Fraud (Studi kasus Mahasiswa Akuntansi Se-Madura). Madura: Universitas Trunojoyo Madura.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 JURNAL ILMIAH RESEARCH STUDENT
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
