THE EXISTENCE OF MUSLIM-FRIENDLY KOS TREND IN MALANG CITY: DO THE PEOPLE OF MALANG REJECT INTOLERANCE?: CASE STUDY IN MERJOSARI VILLAGE, MALANG CITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61722/jmia.v1i5.2680Keywords:
Muslim/Muslimah-exclusive boarding houses, accommodation labeling, religious toleranceAbstract
This study examines the phenomenon of the existence of Muslim/Muslimah-exclusive boarding houses in Merjosari Village, Malang City. The research aims to explore and understand the underlying reasons for the presence of the "Accepting Muslim/Muslimah Tenants" label in several boarding houses within the area. Utilizing a qualitative approach with interview and observation methods, the results reveal that this phenomenon is not intended to discriminate against non-Muslim individuals, but rather serves as an effort by boarding house owners to maintain a religious and social environment aligned with prevailing norms. Furthermore, the study identifies previous traumatic experiences among some boarding house owners when renting to non-Muslim tenants, such as behavior that contradicts the local values and norms. This research is expected to contribute to the formulation of policies by the government, educational institutions, and the community regarding more inclusive accommodation options, as well as to promote a better understanding and realization of tolerance within the social environment.
References
Afisi, O. T., & Oluwaseyi, O. A. (2020). Multiculturalism and the Challenges of Heterogeneity in Postcolonial Africa LASU Journal of African Studies. 8(March), 1–159.
Albet, P., & Indra Dewi, S. (2019). Strategi Branding Dinas Kebudayaan dan Pariwisata Kota Malang dalam Membentuk Image Sebagai Kota Pariwisata. Jurnal Komunikasi Nusantara, 1(2), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.33366/jkn.v1i2.27
Alvianna, S., Patalo, R. G., Hidayatullah, S., & Rachmawati, I. K. (2020). Terhadap Kepuasan Generasi Millenial Berkunjung ke Tempat Wisata. Jurnal Kepariwisataan: Destinasi, Hospitalitas Dan Perjalanan, 4(1), 53–59. https://doi.org/10.34013/jk.v4i2.41
Ardiansyah, Risnita, & Jailani, M. S. (2023). Teknik Pengumpulan Data Dan Instrumen Penelitian Ilmiah Pendidikan Pada Pendekatan Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif. Jurnal IHSAN : Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 1(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.61104/ihsan.v1i2.57
Balaka, M. Y. (2022). Metode penelitian Kuantitatif. In Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan Kualitatif (Vol. 1).
Damayanti Asikin, Rinawati P. Handajani, & Jenny Ernawati. (2022). Adaptasi Berhuni Mahasiswa pada Hunian Indekos di Kota Malang. Jurnal Lingkungan Binaan Indonesia, 11(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.32315/jlbi.v11i2.158
Go, A. F., & Vidiadari, I. S. (2020). Hambatan Komunikasi Antar Budaya Mahasiswa Ntt Di Yogyakarta. Mediakom, 3(2), 147. https://doi.org/10.32528/mdk.v3i2.3131
Ivy Dian Puspitasari Prabowol, Titin Lestariningsih2, D. P. M. (2024). POTENSI KULINER LOKAL SEBAGAI DAYA TARIK KOTA MALANG. Jurnal Industri Parawisata, 6(2), 143–146.
Karwur, C. E. T., Lumunon, T. H. ., & Tinangon, E. N. (2024). Pemenuhan Hak Memperoleh Kesehatan Ditinjau dari Pasal 28 H Ayat 1 Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Unsrat Lex Privatum, 13(02), 1–12.
Kost Muslim Dan Representasi Citra Diri Muslimah (2020).
Lee, J. J. (2022). Religious Exclusivism and Mass Beliefs about the Religion v. Science Debate: A Cross-National Study. International Journal of Sociology, 52(3), 229–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207659.2022.2055288
Lekairua, J., Siahaya, A., & Toisuta, M. (2023). Perilaku Mahasiswa Kos-Kosan Dalam Perspektif Etika Kristen. 4, 624–633. https://e-journal.iaknambon.ac.id/index.php/DX/article/download/822/361
Masdar Hilmy. (2014). GENEALOGI DAN PENGARUH IDEOLOGI JIHADISME NEGARA ISLAM IRAQ DAN SURIAH (NIIS) DI INDONESIA. Procedia Manufacturing, 1(22 Jan), 1–17.
Muryana. (2017). KEBEBASAN EKSPRESI KEAGAMAAN DI JOGJA CITY OF TOLERANCE (STUDI KASUS TOLERANSI DAN INTOLERANSI DI BALIK PLANK “TERIMA KOST PUTRA MUSLIM/PUTRI MUSLIMAH”). Ekp, 13(3), 1576–1580.
Ogie Nuggraha, & Durohim Amnan. (2023). Distorsi Keterwakilan Perempuan Melalui Pasal 8 ayat (2) PKPU Nomor 10 Tahun 2023. Jurnal Hukum Dan Sosial Politik, 1(4), 159–171. https://doi.org/10.59581/jhsp-widyakarya.v1i4.1446
Rosita, E., Hidayat, W., & Yuliani, W. (2021). Uji Validitas Dan Reliabilitas Kuesioner Perilaku Prososial. FOKUS (Kajian Bimbingan & Konseling Dalam Pendidikan), 4(4), 279. https://doi.org/10.22460/fokus.v4i4.7413
Saarinen, A., Keltikangas-Järvinen, L., Dobewall, H., Cloninger, C. R., Ahola-Olli, A., Lehtimäki, T., Hutri-Kähönen, N., Raitakari, O., Rovio, S., & Ravaja, N. (2022). Does social intolerance vary according to cognitive styles, genetic cognitive capacity, or education? Brain and Behavior, 12(9), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2704
Sabar, O. :, Stab, S., Sriwijaya, N., & Banten, T. (2019). Respon Mahasiswa Buddhis Terhadap Situasi Intoleransi Antarumat Beragama Di Indonesia. Jurnal Vijjacariya, 6(1), 97–112. https://www.bbc.com/
Sari, E. N., & Samsuri, S. (2020). Etnosentrisme dan Sikap Intoleran Pendatang Terhadap Orang Papua. Jurnal Antropologi: Isu-Isu Sosial Budaya, 22(1), 142. https://doi.org/10.25077/jantro.v22.n1.p142-150.2020
Sukmayadi, Q. M. A., Sardin, S., & Utami, N. F. (2023). Generasi Z dalam Komunitas Keagamaan: Potensi Intoleransi Beragama melalui Budaya Eksklusif dalam Memahami Agama. Jurnal Pemikiran Sosiologi, 10(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.22146/jps.v10i1.81066
Tillman. (2004). living values activities for young adults.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 JURNAL MULTIDISIPLIN ILMU AKADEMIK
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.