PENGGUNAAN ALAT BUKTI ELEKTRONIK DALAM PROSES PERADILAN PERDATA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61722/jmia.v2i1.3151Keywords:
Electronic Evidence, Civil Litigation, Procedural Law, Information Technology, Legal RegulationsAbstract
The development of information technology has brought significant changes to the process of evidence presentation in civil litigation. Electronic evidence, such as emails, instant messages, and digital documents, is now legally recognized as evidence with the same probative value as physical documents. This study analyzes the position of electronic evidence in Indonesian civil procedural law, identifies its advantages and disadvantages, and discusses the challenges faced in its implementation. Based on Law No. 11 of 2008 on Electronic Information and Transactions and its amendment through Law No. 19 of 2016, electronic evidence has been incorporated into the evidentiary system in courts, enabling the use of various digital formats in trials. However, the main challenges include the authentication of evidence, the risk of data manipulation, the admissibility of evidence depending on regulations, and the costs of managing electronic evidence. This study concludes that while electronic evidence plays an important role in the modernization of civil litigation, its success heavily depends on clear regulations and the enhancement of the judiciary’s capacity to effectively manage digital evidence.
References
Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik
Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2019 Tentang Administrasi Perkara dan Persidangan Di Pengadilan Secara Elektronik
As’ad, Abd. Rasyid, 2012, Akta Elektronik Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Perkara Perdata.
Bambang Indra Gunawan, 2020, Penerapan Surat Elektronik Sebagai Bukti Elektronik Dalam Sengketa Hukum Perdata Di Indonesia, Jurnal Lex Justitia
Drs. Muntasir, M.H.P., 2022.Kedudukan Alat Bukti Elektronik Dalam Hukum Acara Perdata (Menimbang Praktik Pemeriksaan Alat Bukti Elektronik Pada Pengadilan Agama). Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia.
Herlambang, P. H., Utama, Y. J., & Putrijanti, A. (2024). Harmonisasi Hukum UU Peratun dan UU ITE dalam Ketentuan Alat Bukti Elektronik sebagai Alat Bukti Tambahan dalam Sistem Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 6(1), 61-81.
Rahmad, N., Arifah, K. N., Setiyawan, D., Ramli, M., & Daud, B. S. (2023, January). Efektivitas Bukti Elektronik Dalam Uu Ite Sebagai Perluasan Sistem Pembuktian Dalam Kuhap. In Prosiding University Research Colloquium (pp. 96-111).
Sudikno Mertokusumo, 2002, Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia, Liberty, Yogyakarta.
Sutantio Retnowulan dan Iskandar O, C.V . Mandar Maju, Hukum Acara Perdata Dalam Teori Dan Praktek, Cet. X, Bandung, 2005.
Syahrani H. Riduan, Buku Materi Dasar Hukum Acara Perdata, PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2004
Janner Damanik, 2021, Eksistensi Alat Bukti Surat Elektronik Dalam Perkara Perdata, Jurnal Institusi Politeknik Ganesha Medan.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 JURNAL MULTIDISIPLIN ILMU AKADEMIK

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.