Lemahnya Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi Tambang terhadap Pencemaran Lingkungan: Solusi Penerapan Sanksi Hukum dan Pemulihan Ekologis

Authors

  • Rayi Kharisma Rajib Universitas Negeri Semarang
  • Ahmad Munawar Nuril Ibtisan Universitas Negeri Semarang
  • Euclid Abraham Pasaribu Universitas Negeri Semarang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61722/jmia.v3i2.9853

Keywords:

corporate liability, ecological, environmental pollution, legal sanctions, mining corporations; restoration

Abstract

The mining sector in Indonesia makes a significant contribution to the national economy, but at the same time causes serious environmental impacts, including water pollution, land degradation, and the loss of biodiversity. Although Indonesia has a comprehensive legal framework through Law No. 32 of 2009 on Environmental Protection and Management (UUPPLH), its implementation in practice is still far from optimal. This study aims to analyze the factors hindering the implementation of mining corporations’ accountability for environmental pollution, as well as to assess the effectiveness of legal sanctions and ecological restoration mechanisms in enhancing corporate accountability. The research findings indicate that the weakness of mining corporations’ accountability stems from three primary factors: the lack of oversight and institutional capacity among law enforcement agencies, low corporate compliance with environmental regulations, and a significant gap between regulations and their implementation on the ground. Furthermore, the multi-tiered sanction system under the Environmental Protection and Management Law (UUPPLH) which includes administrative, civil, and criminal sanctions is normatively adequate but has failed to produce a tangible deterrent effect, as the sanctions imposed are often disproportionate to the corporations’ economic gains. Mechanisms for ecological restoration through reclamation, rehabilitation, and ecological compensation have also not been optimally implemented due to weak post-mining oversight. This study concludes that the effectiveness of environmental law is not solely determined by the comprehensiveness of regulations, but by the consistency of enforcement and the commitment of all stakeholders to ensuring ecological sustainability.

References

Faturohman, Muhammad Fachri Firdaus, and Mochamad Reggy Syah. “PELANGGARAN HAM DI INDONESIA ‘KASUS LUMPUR LAPINDO DI SIDOARJO’” 8, no. 5 (2024): 1–8.

Harefa, Safaruddin. “PENEGAKAN HUKUM DAN TANGGUNG JAWAB KORPORASI TERHADAP EKSPLOITASI LINGKUNGAN TAMBANG.” BPHN 55, no. 1 (2025): 84–89. https://doi.org/10.33331/mhn.v55i1.1090.

Helmi. “Membangun Sistem Perizinan Terpadu Bidang Lingkungan Hidup Di Indonesia” 11, no. 1 (2011): 140–48.

Heriyansyah. “IMPLEMENTASI PERATURAN PEMERINTAH NOMOR 78 TAHUN 2010 TENTANG REKLAMASI DAN PASCATAMBANG” 3, no. 1 (2015): 520–34.

Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2009 tentang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup.

Latifaturrohmah, Tsabita, and Rochmat Junarto. “Perlindungan, Penegakan Dan Pemenuhan Hak Atas Tanah Korban Lumpur Lapindo.” Tunas Agraria 6, no. 1 (2023): 56–70. https://doi.org/10.31292/jta.v6i1.204.

Muntaha, Revima Nelyna. “Tanggung Jawab Korporasi Dalam Kasus Pencemaran Lingkungan: Analisis Penegakan Hukum Berdasarkan Perkembangan Kasus Lingkungan Terkini Di Indonesia.” CAUSA 16, no. 2 (2025): 6. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.3783/causa.v2i9.2461.

Prastiti, Hilda Swandani. “MENAKAR EFEKTIVITAS PENDEKATAN PENAATAN ( COMPLIANCE A PPROACH ) DAN PENDEKATAN PENJERAAN ( DETERRENCE APPROACH ) DALAM PENEGAKAN HUKUM LINGKUNGAN” 6, no. 1 (2021): 1–13.

Purnama, Azura Yumna Ramadani. “ESDM: IUP Mineral Dan Batu Bara Capai 4.252 per November 2025.” Indonesian Mining Association, 2025. https://ima-api.org/esdm-iup-mineral-dan-batu-bara-capai-4-252-per-november-2025/.

Rachmat, Niken Aulia. “Hukum Pidana Lingkungan Di Indonesia Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2009 Tentang Perlindungan Dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup Environmental Criminal Law in Indonesia Based on Law Number 32 of 2009 Concerning Environmental Protection and Managem” 2, no. 2 (2022): 188–207. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/ipmhi.v2i2.53737.

Rahim, Firsyahrina Maharani. “Dilema Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi : Anatomi Kejahatan Lingkungan Dalam Industri Pertambangan Indonesia” 4, no. 1 (2025): 4619–33. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.61104/alz.v4i1.3894.

Rangkuti, Siti Sundari. Hukum Lingkungan & Kebijaksanaan Lingkungan Nasional. Surabaya: Airlangga University Press, 1996.

Setiawan, Verda Nano. “RI Duduki Posisi Teratas Pemilik Emas, Nikel-Batu Bara Hingga Timah!” CNBC Indonesia, 2025. https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/news/20250815075908-4-658133/ri-duduki-posisi-teratas-pemilik-emas-nikel-batu-bara-hingga-timah.

Siahaan. Hukum Lingkungan Dan Ekologi Pembangunan. Jakarta: Erlangga, 2004.

Silalahi, Wilma, and Joe Aprella Indra. “Penerapan Hukum Lingkungan Dalam Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Alam” 3, no. 3 (2025): 229–37.

Siombo, Marhaeni Ria. “Arah Politik Hukum Lingkungan Di Indonesia,” 1990, 381–89.

Soemarwoto, Otto. Ekologi Lingkungan Hidup Dan Pembangunan. Yogyakarta, 1991.

Sugianto, Fajar, Sanggup Leonard Agustian, and Permata Nisa Basti. “EKSISTENSI PRINSIP PENCEMAR MEMBAYAR DALAM SISTEM PENEGAKAN HUKUM AGRATIA.” Tanjungpura Law Journal 4, no. 1 (2019): 1–21.

Syaprillah, Aditia. Buku Ajar Mata Kuliah Hukum Lingkungan. Edited by Deepublish. Yogyakarta, 2018.

Wijoyo, Suparto. HUKUM PERLINDUNGAN LINGKUNGAN HIDUP. Surabaya: Airlangga University Press, n.d.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-30