Dilema Sistem Return to Seller (RTS) dan Integrasi Data Lintas Platform terhadap Kinerja Kurir (Studi Kasus pada J&T Express DC_Gubeng)

Authors

  • Maya Susanti Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945
  • Hesti Cahya Adistia Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945
  • Jennie Amanda Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945
  • Tan Evan Tandiyono Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61722/jrme.v3i4.11394

Keywords:

Management Information System, Cash on Delivery (COD), Return to Sender (RTS), Risk Mitigation, Data Integration

Abstract

The Cash on Delivery (COD) system remains a popular choice for consumers as it guarantees a sense of security in transactions, but this method creates high operational complexity for J&T Express. The main problems that frequently occur in the field include unilateral payment rejections by consumers and high rates of returns or Return to Sender (RTS). This qualitative case study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the Management Information System at J&T Express DC_Gubeng, Surabaya, through direct observation and in-depth interviews with supervisors, admins, and field couriers. Field findings indicate that the problematic address validation feature has not been automatically implemented in the system, but still relies on courier experience and manual confirmation via WhatsApp before the goods are delivered. The biggest technical obstacle stems from the misalignment of upstream API integration with the e-commerce platform, which triggers a loophole for cross-platform fake receipt manipulation (cross-marketplace fraud). In addition, the RTS procedure, which requires three physical delivery attempts, wastes the courier's effective working time (idle time). Delays in synchronizing order cancellation data from the application have also been shown to reduce the achievement of the courier's digital KPI targets. On the positive side, GoPay's digital wallet-based financial interconnection has proven highly reliable in maintaining accurate real-time cash-on-delivery (COD) reporting and reducing daily financial disputes. As a recommendation, J&T Express should optimize upstream data integration with e-commerce partners and relax package return regulations to achieve operational efficiency.

References

Assauri, S. (2016). Manajemen Operasi Produksi: Pencapaian Perubahan dan Kelangsungan Mutu (Edisi 3)

Badri, M. (2018). Sistem Informasi Manajemen: Konsep dan Aplikasi dalam Organisasi. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Bahra, M. B. (2013). Analisis dan Desain Sistem Informasi. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu

Heizer, J., & Render, B. (2015). Manajemen Operasi: Manajemen Keberlangsungan dan Rantai Pasokan (Edisi 11). Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Kadir, A. (2014). Pengantar Sistem Informasi Edisi Revisi. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset

Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (Edisi Revisi). Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Pujawan, I. N., & Mahendrawathi, E. R. (2017). Supply Chain Management (Edisi 3). Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.

Rusdiana, H. A., & Irfan, M. (2014). Sistem Informasi Manajemen. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.

Sanusi, A. (2011). Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Siregar, A. P. (2021). Logistik Kontemporer: Konsep, Teori, dan Implementasi di Indonesia. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.

Sudaryono. (2018). Manajemen Pemasaran: Teori dan Implementasi. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.

Widjajanto, N. (2002). Sistem Informasi Akuntansi. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-27

Issue

Section

Articles