Dampak Keterbukaan Perdagangan terhadap Indeks Kinerja Lingkungan OECD
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61722/jrme.v2i1.3777Keywords:
Environmental Performance Index; Trade Openness; Energy; Technology; PopulationAbstract
Penelitian ini menganalisis pengaruh keterbukaan perdagangan terhadap indeks kinerja lingkungan di negara-negara OECD secara empiris. Data yang digunakan berupa data panel dari 38 negara anggota OECD selama delapan tahun. Penelitian ini menerapkan metode regresi data panel, dengan Random Effect Model (REM) terpilih sebagai model terbaik. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa keterbukaan perdagangan, energi, teknologi, dan jumlah penduduk memiliki pengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap indeks kinerja lingkungan. Temuan ini menegaskan pentingnya peran perdagangan internasional, penggunaan energi, kemajuan teknologi, dan dinamika demografi dalam meningkatkan kinerja lingkungan di negara-negara OECD. Penelitian ini memberikan kontribusi pada pemahaman hubungan antara faktor ekonomi dan lingkungan, serta implikasinya terhadap kebijakan pembangunan berkelanjutan di tingkat global.
References
Abbasi, F., & Riaz, K. (2016). CO2 emissions and financial development in an emerging economy: An augmented VAR approach. Energy Policy, 90, 102–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.12.017
Aguilera-Caracuel, J., Guerrero-Villegas, J., Garcia-Sanchez, E. (2020). Does green innovation affect the financial performance of Multilatinas? The moderating role of ISO 14001 and R&D investment. Business Strategy and the Environment, in press, https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2572
Al Mamun, M., Sohag, K., Shahbaz, M., & Hammoudeh, S. (2018). Financial markets, innovations and cleaner energy production in OECD countries. Energy Economics, 72, 236–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. eneco.2018.04.011
Alvarez-Herránz, A., Balsalobre, D., Cantos, J. M., & Shahbaz, M. (2017). Energy innovations-GHG emissions nexus: Fresh empirical evidence from OECD countries. Energy Policy, 101, 90–100. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.enpol.2016.11.030
Alvarez-Herranz, A., Balsalobre-Lorente, D., Shahbaz, M., & Cantos, J. M. (2017). Energy innovation and renewable energy consumption in the correction of air pollution levels. Energy Policy, 105, 386–397. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.009
Baloch, M. A., & Meng, F. (2019). Modeling the non-linear relationship between financial development and energy consumption: Statistical experience from OECD countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26, 8838–8846. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019- 04317-9
Baloch, M. A., Mahmood, N., & Zhang, J. W. (2019). Effect of natural resources, renewable energy and economic development on CO2 emissions in BRICS countries. Science of the Total Environment, 678, 632–638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.028
Baloch, M. A., Meng, F., Zhang, J., & Xu, Z. (2018). Financial instability and CO2 emissions: The case of Saudi Arabia. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25, 26030–26045. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11356-018-2654-2
Balsalobre, D., Alvarez, A., & Cantos, J. M. (2015). Public budgets for energy RD&D and the effects on energy intensity and pollution levels. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 22, 4881–4892. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3121-3
Baltagi, B. H., Bratberg, E., & Holmås, T. H. (2005). A panel data study of physicians' labor supply: The case of Norway. Health Economics, 14, 1035–1045. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.991
Chang, S.-C. (2015). Effects of financial developments and income on energy consumption. International Review of Economics and Finance, 35, 28–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2014.08.011
Copeland, B. R., & Taylor, M. S. (2004). Trade, growth, and the environment. Journal of Economic Literature, 42, 7–71.
Dalton, M., O’Neill, B., Prskawetz, A., Jiang, L., & Pitkin, J. (2008). Population aging and future carbon emissions in the United States. Energy Economics, 30, 642–675.
Demirel, M., Demirel, D. H., & Isik, U. (2016). Environmental sustainability for future generations (a comparison of 2020’s candidate cities). Anthropologist, 24, 652–656.
Destek, M. A., & Okumus, I. (2019). Does pollution haven hypothesis hold in newly industrialized countries? Evidence from ecological footprint. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26, 23689–23695.
Dogan, B., & Deger, O. (2016). How globalization and economic growth affect energy consumption: panel data analysis in the sample of Brazil, Russia, India, China countries. Journal of Energy Economics Policy, 6, 806–813.
Dumitrescu, E.-I., & Hurlin, C. (2012). Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Economic Modelling, 29, 1450–1460.
Eberhardt, M. (2012). Estimating panel time-series models with heterogeneous slopes. Stata Journal: Promoting Communications in Statistics and Stata, 12, 61–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X1201200105
Ertugrul, H. M., Cetin, M., Seker, F., & Dogan, E. (2016). The impact of trade openness on global carbon dioxide emissions: Evidence from the top ten emitters among developing countries. Ecological Indicators, 67, 543–555..
Fang, J., Gozgor, G., Lu, Z., & Wu, W. (2019). Effects of the export product quality on carbon dioxide emissions: Evidence from developing economies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26, 12181–12193.
Friedl, B., & Getzner, M. (2003). Determinants of CO2 emissions in a small open economy. Ecological Economics, 45, 133–148.
Ghosh, S. (2010). Examining carbon emissions economic growth nexus for India: A multivariate cointegration approach. Energy Policy, 38, 3008–3014.
Gozgor, G., & Can, M. (2016). Does export product quality matter for CO2 emissions? Evidence from China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24..
Gozgor, G., Mahalik, M. K., Demir, E., & Padhan, H. (2020). The impact of economic globalization on renewable energy in the OECD countries. Energy Policy, 139, 111365.
Hao, L.-N., Umar, M., Khan, Z., & Ali, W. (2021). Green growth and low carbon emission in G7 countries: How critical the network of environmental taxes, renewable energy and human capital is? Science of the Total Environment, 752, 141853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141853
Hashmi, R., & Alam, K. (2019). Dynamic relationship among environmental regulation, innovation, CO2 emissions, population, and economic growth in OECD countries: A panel investigation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 231, 1100–1109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.325
Hatfield-Dodds, S., Schandl, H., Adams, P. D., Baynes, T. M., Brinsmead, T. S., Bryan, B. A., et al. (2015). Australia is “free to choose” economic growth and falling environmental pressures. Nature, 527, 49–53. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16065
Hu, G., Can, M., Paramati, S. R., Dogan, B., & Fang, J. (2020). The effect of import product diversification on carbon emissions: New evidence for sustainable economic policies. Economic Analysis and Policy, 65, 198–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2020.01.004
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 JURNAL RUMPUN MANAJEMEN DAN EKONOMI
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
