PERBANDINGAN KUALITAS SEDIAAN APUS DARAH TEPI MENGGUNAKAN AIR KERAN DAN AQUADES SEBAGAI PENGGANTI LARUTAN BUFFER

Authors

  • Amwalia Sarjana Terapan Teknologi Laboratorium Medis, Poltekkes Kemenkes Jakarta III
  • Eva Ayu Maharani Sarjana Terapan Teknologi Laboratorium Medis, Poltekkes Kemenkes Jakarta III
  • Dewi Astuti Sarjana Terapan Teknologi Laboratorium Medis, Poltekkes Kemenkes Jakarta III

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61722/jssr.v4i3.10815

Keywords:

SADT staining, pH 6.8 buffer, tap water, distilled water

Abstract

In the SADT staining procedure, a buffer solution with a pH range of 6.8-7.2 is used. This pH range is ideal because it is able to provide a balance between staining the cell nucleus by azure B and staining the cytoplasm by eosin Y. Buffer pH affects the quality of staining by regulating dye ionization with cell components. However, the use of standard pH buffers is sometimes limited in the laboratory, so other alternative diluents such as tap water and distilled water are used. This study aims to compare the quality of SADT staining results using pH 6.8 buffer, tap water and distilled water. This research method is quasi experiment, with posttest-only control group design based on scoring assessment of microscopic observations and significant difference test. The results of the average scoring showed a cell picture in tap water 2.50 (not good), distilled water 3.22 (good), and control 3.33 (good). Statistical tests showed no significant difference between groups with a p-value of 0.091 (p> 0.05). Conclusion: there are differences in microscopic quality based on scoring results, but statistically there is no significant difference. This shows that although there are differences in microscopic quality, blood cells can be identified.

References

Alawiyah, N, N. (2023). Kualitas Pewarnaan Sediaan Apus Darah Tipis Dengan Menggunakan Ekstrak Kulit Terong Ungu (Solanum melongena L.).

Bezrukov, A. V. (2017). Romanowsky staining, the Romanowsky effect and thoughts on the question of scientific priority. Biotechnic and Histochemistry, 92(1), 29–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/10520295.2016.1250285

Dewi Yayuningsih, AMAK, S.Si., M., Hendro Prayitno, Am. A., & Roudhotul Mazidah, Am. A. (2017). HEMATOLOGI :program keahlian teknologi laboratorium medik. EGC.

Huda, G. (2023). Apusan Darah Tepi. Alomedika. https://www.alomedika.com/tindakan-medis/hematologi-dan-onkologi/apus-darah-tepi

Malik, M. A. (2023). What is a pH buffer? Hampton University. https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Introduction_to_General_Chemistry_(Malik)/06:_Acids_and_bases/6.08:_pH_Buffers

Muflihah, A. I., Destiawan, R. A., Wijaya, A. F., Yulia, L., Sufi, Q. N., Camelia, L., Azizah, N., Makki, A. A., & Imroatul, A. (2024). Gambaran Morfologi Sel Neutrofil Pada Pewarnaan Giemsa dengan Variasi Waktu Pada Larutan Pengencer Akuades. 10(1), 126–135.

Mustafa, A., Astuti, T. D., & Widyantara, A. B. (2024). Perbedaan Apusan Darah Metode Giemsa Menggunakan Buffer Fosfat, Aquades dan NaCl Fisiologis. 6(September), 7837–7842.

Oktiyani, N., Muhlisin, A., Roebiakto, E., & Norsiah, W. (2023). Utilization of Alternative Buffer Solutions for Staining Thin Blood smears by the Giemsa , Wright stain and Romanowsky method. 5(1), 34–45.

Rahma, S., Muhlisin, A., & Arsyad, M. (2019). Perbedaan Kualitas Hasil Pewarnaan Sediaan Darah Metode Wright Menggunakan Air Pdam, Aquadest Dan Buffer pH Standar 6,8. Jurnal Ergastrio, 5(2), 16–21. http://jurnalstikesborneolestari.ac.id/index.php/analisborles/article/view/158

Yati, M., Muhlisin, A., Muntaha, A., & Roebiakto, E. (2023). Kualitas Pewarnaan Sediaan Apusan Darah Metode Giemsa Menggunakan Alternatif Pewarna Buah Naga Pengencer Air Mineral. Jurnal Karya Generasi Sehat, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.31964/jkgs.v1i1.66

Downloads

Published

2026-06-11

Issue

Section

Articles