Screening In Silico dan Penambatan Molekuler Senyawa Turunan 4-Hydroxytamoxifen (OHT) sebagai Kandidat Agen Anti Kanker Payudara terhadap Estrogen Receptor Alpha (ER-????)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61722/jssr.v4i4.11274Keywords:
Breast cancer, ER-α, 4-Hydroxytamoxifen, Molecular Docking, DOCK6, PM6Abstract
Luminal breast cancer subtypes expressing Estrogen Receptor Alpha (ER-α) account for approximately 70% of breast cancer cases globally. Although hormonal therapy using the active ligand 4-hydroxytamoxifen (OHT) has been widely employed, its long-term efficacy is frequently hampered by drug resistance and adverse side effects. This study aims to design and evaluate, in silico, the potential of structurally modified OHT derivatives as more effective and selective ER-α inhibitor candidates. Ligand geometry optimization was performed using the semi-empirical PM6 method in Gaussian software. Molecular docking simulations were conducted using DOCK6 against the ER-α crystal structure (PDB ID: 3ERT), validated through a re-docking procedure of the reference ligand. Molecular interaction analysis was visualized in 2D/3D using BIOVIA Discovery Studio. Method validation showed high accuracy, with a Root Mean Square Deviation (RMSD) value of 1.032 Å (< 2.0 Å). Docking results revealed that the native ligand OHT-opt exhibited the best grid score (−59.47 kJ/mol), followed by pyrrolidine-OHT (−58.47 kJ/mol) and mono-fluoro-OHT (−56.11 kJ/mol). Interaction analysis showed that the mono-fluoro-OHT modification retains the essential hydrogen bond with the anchoring residue ARG101.A (2.716 Å) while forming a new hydrogen bond with GLU60 (2.668 Å) on helix 3 (H3). This new interaction may disrupt the receptor's allosteric conformation, potentially preventing transcriptional activation. This study concludes that structural modifications of OHT derivatives, particularly pyrrolidine-OHT and mono-fluoro-OHT, exhibit competitive binding affinities and hold strong potential to be developed as novel therapeutic agents for breast cancer, pending further validation through molecular dynamics simulations and in vitro experiments.
References
Asaumi, S., Azra, F., & Kusnananda, A.J. (2026). Molecular Docking Senyawa Bioaktif Tempuyung (Sonchus arvensis) Terhadap Reseptor ER-α Sebagai Inhibitor Kanker Payudara. Jurnal Farmasi Indonesia, 18(1), 105 – 112. https://doi.org/10.35617/jfionline.v18i1.414
Asmuruf, F., Futwembun, A., & Kopeuw, A. J. (2017). Karakteristik Struktur Elektronik Pada Senyawa Goniotalamin, Infektokaryon, dan Kurzicalkolakton Menggunakan Metode Density Functional Theory (DFT). Frans. Avogadro Jurnal Kimia, 4(1), 24- 30.
Ferreira, L. G., dos Santos, R. N., Oliva, G., & Andricopulo, A. D. (2015). Molecular Docking and Structure-based Drug Design Strategies. Molecules, 20(7), 13384–13421. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules20713384
TilakVijay, J., Vivek Babu, K., & Uma, A. (2019). Virtual Screening of Novel Compounds as Potential ER-alpha Inhibitors. Bioinformation, 15(5), 321–332. https://doi.org/10.6026/97320630015321
Tripathi, A., Suri, K., K, S., & Murugan, N. A. (2025). Assessing the Accuracy of Binding Pose Prediction for Kinase Proteins and 7-azaindole Inhibitors: A Study with AutoDock4, Vina, DOCK 6, and GNINA 1.0. RSC Advances, 15(55), 47051–47065. https://doi.org/10.1039/d5ra05526a
Bray, F., Laversanne, M., Sung, H., Ferlay, J., Siegel, R. L., Soerjomataram, I., & Jemal, A. (2024). Global Cancer Statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 74(3), 229–263.https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21834
Cardoso, F., Paluch-Shimon, S., Senkus, E., Curigliano, G., Aapro, M. S., André, F., Barrios, C. H., Bergh, J., Bhatt, D. L., Cardoso, M. J., Carey, L., Corneliussen-James, D., Cufer, T., El Saghir, N., Elzayat, M., Escalone, A., Fallowfield, L., Francis, P. A., Gelmon, K., & Winer, E. P. (2024). 7th ESO–ESMO International Consensus Guidelines for Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC 7). Annals of Oncology, 35(11), 953–984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2024.08.009
Chen, D., Oezguen, N., Urvil, P., Ferguson, C., Dann, S. M., & Savidge, T. C. (2016). Regulation of Protein-ligand Binding Affinity by Hydrogen Bond Pairing. Science Advances, 2(3), e1501240. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1501240
DiMasi, J. A., Grabowski, H. G., & Hansen, R. W. (2016). Innovation in the Pharmaceutical Industry: New Estimates of R&D Costs. Journal of Health Economics, 47, 20–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2016.01.012
Giaquinto, A. N., Sung, H., Newman, L. A., Freedman, R. A., Smith, R. A., Star, J., Jemal, A., & Siegel, R. L. (2024). Breast Cancer Statistics 2024. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 74(6), 477–495. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21863
Harbeck, N., Penault-Llorca, F., Cortes, J., Gnant, M., Houssami, N., Poortmans, P., Ruddy, K., Tsang, J., & Cardoso, F. (2019). Breast Cancer. Nature Reviews Disease Primers, 5(1), 66. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-019-0111-2
Jeselsohn, R., Buchwalter, G., De Angelis, C., Brown, M., & Schiff, R. (2015). ESR1 mutations—A Mechanism for Acquired Endocrine Resistance in Breast Cancer. Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, 12(10), 573–583. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2015.117
Osborne, C. K., & Schiff, R. (2011). Mechanisms of Endocrine Resistance in Breast Cancer. Annual Review of Medicine, 62(1), 233–247. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-med-070909-182917
Śledź, P., & Caflisch, A. (2018). Protein Structure-based Drug Design: From Docking to Molecular Dynamics. Current Opinion in Structural Biology, 48, 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbi.2017.10.010
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 JOURNAL SAINS STUDENT RESEARCH

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.











