Lanskap Suci dan Perlindungan Lingkungan di Gunung Pegat, Srengat, Blitar: Mitologi Punokawan Sebagai Mekanisme Konservasi Informal
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61722/jssr.v4i4.11386Keywords:
sacred landscape; informal conservation; Punokawan mytholog;, structuration; Mount Pegat.Abstract
Mount Pegat in Blitar Regency is an area with strong cultural and spiritual values through the Punokawan mythology passed down through generations by the local community. Beliefs in sites such as Sawah Semar and Sumur Kahuripan not only shape the sacredness of the area but also influence how the community interacts with the environment. This study aims to analyze the construction of the sacred landscape of Mount Pegat, the role of Punokawan mythology as an informal conservation mechanism, and the process of sacred reproduction in the community's social life. The study used a qualitative approach with ethnographic methods. Data were obtained through observation, in-depth interviews, and documentation involving community leaders, area managers, and local residents. Data analysis was carried out through the stages of data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions using Anthony Giddens' structuration theory as an analytical tool. The results show that Punokawan mythology plays a role in the cultural structure that shapes the community's understanding of Mount Pegat as a sacred landscape. The beliefs and norms that develop in the community encourage behavior to protect vegetation, water sources, and sacred sites, resulting in informal conservation practices. The sacredness of the area continues to be maintained through the transmission of oral stories, the role of community leaders, and daily social practices that reproduce these cultural values. Research findings indicate that environmental conservation can thrive through local belief systems that are alive within the community, thus fostering a mutually reinforcing relationship between culture and the environment in maintaining the sustainability of the sacred landscape.
References
Amalia, N. (2025). Akulturasi Agama dan Budaya dalam Wisata Religi: Studi Kasus Pesarean Gunung Kawi Malang. An-Nuha : Jurnal Kajian Islam, Pendidikan, Budaya Dan Sosial, 12(1), 315–338. https://doi.org/10.36835/annuha.v12i1.710
Anandagiri, D. A. W. M., Suarka, I. N., & Astiti Laksmi, N. K. P. (2025). TOURISTIFICATION OF THE PURA AGUNG BESAKIH AREA AS A CULTURAL TOURISM DESTINATION. E-Journal of Cultural Studies, 18(1), 113–120. https://doi.org/10.24843/cs.2025.v18.i01.p01
Assmann, J. (2011). Communicative and Cultural Memory (pp. 15–27). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8945-8_2
Baburaj, A., & Pannicott, D. (2023). Mnemonic Communities of Displaced Indigenous People: Northeast Indian Narratives of Cultural Memory. Journal of Narrative and Language Studies. https://doi.org/10.59045/nalans.2023.32
Berkes, F. (2023). Making Connections: Leopold’s Land Health, Indigenous Ways of Knowing, Social-Ecological Resilience, and One Health. CABI One Health. https://doi.org/10.1079/cabionehealth.2023.0008
Berkes, F. (2024). Biodiversity, Religion Traditions. In Encyclopedia of Biodiversity (pp. 18–29). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-822562-2.00011-6
Ch., A. A., & Rudyansjah, T. (2020). Harmoni Lanskap Spiritual dan Kontestasi Komoditas di Gunung Kawi. Antropologi Indonesia, 40(2). https://doi.org/10.7454/ai.v40i2.12770
Christopher Tilley, & Kate Cameron-Daum. (2017). An Anthropology of Landscape. UCL Press. https://doi.org/10.14324/111.9781911307433
Del-Shamarran, N. (2022). Why Society Change: Anthony Giddens’s Structuration Theory and Time-Space Distanciation. Dekonstruksi, 7(01), 183–195. https://doi.org/10.54154/dekonstruksi.v7i01.108
Febriani, R., & Riyanto, E. D. (2021). Upacara Adat Tengger di Ambang Komodifikasi: Merawat Tradisi dari Ancaman Desakralisasi. Jurnal Antropologi: Isu-Isu Sosial Budaya, 23(2), 153–155. https://doi.org/10.25077/jantro.v23.n2.p148-156.2021
Fikret Berkes. (2021). Advanced_Introduction_to_Community_based. 192.
Giddens, Anthony. (1984). The constitution of society : outline of the theory of structuration. Polity Press University of California Press.
Imarhiagbe, O., & Ogwu, M. C. (2022). Sacred Groves in the Global South: A Panacea for Sustainable Biodiversity Conservation (pp. 525–546). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-3326-4_20
Kamuri, J. P. (2021). Konsep Worldview: Usaha Melengkapi Konsep Struktur dalam Teori Strukturasi Giddens. Jurnal Filsafat, 31(2), 220. https://doi.org/10.22146/jf.60704
Kennedy, R., & Silverstein, B. (2023). Beyond presentism: Memory studies, deep history and the challenges of transmission. Memory Studies, 16(6), 1609–1627. https://doi.org/10.1177/17506980231203645
Khairul Anam, R. (2025). ANTHONY GIDDENS’S STRUCTURATION THEORY AND RELEVANCE WITH SOCIOLOGY OF KNOWLEDGE. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5151645
Leff, E. (2012). Latin American Environmental Thinking. Environmental Ethics, 34(4), 431–450. https://doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics201234442
Manochkumar, J., Chandrasekaran, R., Swaminathan, U., Nallakaruppan, N., Sekaran, M., TN, R., Buot, I. J., & Ramamoorthy, S. (2026). Sacred groves and forest Conservation: Integrating indigenous traditions with ecological sustainability. Journal for Nature Conservation, 93, 127312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2026.127312
Mulyadi, A., Dede, Moh., & Widiawaty, M. A. (2022). The Role of Tradisional Belief and Local Wisdom in Forest Conservation. Jurnal Geografi Gea, 22(1), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.17509/gea.v22i1.43702
Nurgiyantoro, B. (2011). WAYANG DAN PENGEMBANGAN KARAKTER BANGSA. Jurnal Pendidikan Karakter, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.21831/jpk.v1i1.1314
ORMSBY, A. A., & BHAGWAT, S. A. (2010). Sacred forests of India: a strong tradition of community-based natural resource management. Environmental Conservation, 37(3), 320–326. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892910000561
Po-An Hsieh, J. J., Rai, A., & Keil, M. (2008). Understanding Digital Inequality: Comparing Continued Use Behavioral Models of the Socio-Economically Advantaged and Disadvantaged1. MIS Quarterly, 32(1), 97–126. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148830
Ponge, A. (2026). Sacred Groves and the Supernatural: The Role of Indigenous Beliefs in Biodiversity Conservation and Climate Adaptation in Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Climate Policy, 5(1), 12–32. https://doi.org/10.47941/jcp.3612
Pratiwi, P. I., Sulistyantara, B., Gunawan, A., & Furuya, K. (2014). A Comparative Study on The Perception of Forest Landscape Using LIST Method Between University Students of Japan and Indonesia. Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika (Journal of Tropical Forest Management), 20(3), 172–175. https://doi.org/10.7226/jtfm.20.3.167
Ratnasari, D., Sidiq, F., & Saputra, J. (2023). Local Wisdom, Environmental Management and Sustainable Traditions in Naga Village, Tasikmalaya Regency. International Journal of Ethno-Sciences and Education Research, 3(4), 116–120. https://doi.org/10.46336/ijeer.v3i4.504
Royyani, M., & Rahajoe, J. (2014). BEHIND THE SACRED TREE: LOCAL PEOPLE AND THEIR NATURAL RESOURCES SUSTAINABILITY. REINWARDTIA, 14(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.14203/reinwardtia.v14i1.393
Saad, S., Wediyantoro, P. L., & Zolkifli, A. N. F. (2024). Cultural Preservation in the Digital Age: The Future of Indigenous Folktales and Legends. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, VIII(IX), 2835–2847. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2024.8090237
Sinthumule, N. I. (2023a). Traditional ecological knowledge and its role in biodiversity conservation: a systematic review. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1164900
Sinthumule, N. I. (2023b). Traditional ecological knowledge and its role in biodiversity conservation: a systematic review. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1164900
Subiyantoro, S., Suharto, M., & Fahrudin, D. (2022). ESTETIKA PARADOKS WAYANG PUNAKAWAN DALAM TELAAH TAFSIR SIMBOLIK SEBAGAI SUMBER PENDIDIKAN KARAKTER. Jurnal Pendidikan Karakter, 13(1), 53–56. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpka.v13i1.44773
Syam, C., Olendo, Y. O., Dewantara, J. A., & Rahmani, E. F. (2024). Oral literature and social identity of the Dayak Kanayatn: the extinction of oral literature in the midst of contemporary cultural trends. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2376785
Tatay, J., & Merino, A. (2023a). What is sacred in sacred natural sites? A literature review from a conservation lens. Ecology and Society, 28(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-13823-280112
Tatay, J., & Merino, A. (2023b). What is sacred in sacred natural sites? A literature review from a conservation lens. Ecology and Society, 28(1), art12. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-13823-280112
Theobald, D. M., Jacob, A. L., Elsen, P. R., Beever, E. A., Ehlers, L., & Hilty, J. (2024). Evaluating ecosystem protection and fragmentation of the world’s major mountain regions. Conservation Biology, 38(3), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.14240
Verschuuren, B., Ormsby, A., & Jackson, W. (2022). How Might World Heritage Status Support the Protection of Sacred Natural Sites? An Analysis of Nomination Files, Management, and Governance Contexts. Land, 11(1), 97. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11010097
Wahyuni, M., Santosa, I., Irfansyah, & Julianto, I. N. L. (2023). The Concept of Water Exaltation in The Subak. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(2), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i2.345
Wang, Q. (2024). The “Downward Compatibility” of Assmann’s Cultural Memory. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 17(2), 20–22. https://doi.org/10.54097/1yg07h93
Zahra, N. A., Koimah, S. M., Nugroho, F. T., Ardiansyah, S. S., & Pricillia, K. (2024). Konservasi Makam Keramat Solear Sebagai Warisan Budaya. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Budaya Indonesia, 2(2), 105–109. https://doi.org/10.61476/hd657n06
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 JOURNAL SAINS STUDENT RESEARCH

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.











