Analisis Daya Dukung Dan Penurunan Pondasi Bored Pile Dan Tiang Pancang Dengan Metode Manual Dan Numerik Menggunakan Software Plaxis 2D

Authors

  • Arya Yoga Pratama Universitas Islam Sutan Agung
  • Yanuar Ilham Pasha Universitas Islam Sutan Agung
  • Pratikso Pratikso Universitas Islam Sutan Agung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61722/jssr.v4i5.12503

Keywords:

Soil Bearing Capacity, Soil Settlement, Bored Pile, Driven Pile, Numerical Method

Abstract

The construction of multi-story buildings on soft soil often faces technical challenges due to low soil bearing capacity and significant settlement potential. This study aims to analyze and compare the bearing capacity and settlement of two types of deep foundations, namely bored pile and driven pile foundations. The object of this research is the Ibrahim Tower Building Construction Project at Roemani Muhammadiyah Hospital Semarang, with soil data obtained from the Standard Penetration Test (N-SPT) at depths up to 14 meters. The analysis was conducted through two approaches. The first approach is the manual calculation method using several well-known theories in geotechnical engineering, namely the Meyerhof and Reese & Wright methods for bearing capacity analysis, and the Poulos & Davis method for settlement analysis. The second approach is the numerical method utilizing Plaxis 2D and All Pile software to model soil and foundation behavior computationally. The superstructure load to be received by the foundation was obtained from building structure modeling using ETABS software.The results show that the allowable bearing capacity for a single bored pile ranges from 1537 kN to 1962 kN, while for a single driven pile ranges from 1460 kN to 1869 kN. These values indicate that the bearing capacity of bored piles tends to be higher compared to driven piles at the same depth. In terms of settlement, the analysis results show that the maximum total settlement occurs in the driven pile group, approximately 2.8 cm to 2.9 cm. This value is still far below the allowable settlement limit of 6 cm, so both types of foundations are declared safe for use. Furthermore, the difference between manual and numerical calculation results is relatively small, indicating that both methods can complement each other in the foundation planning process.

References

Bjerrulm, L. (1960). Engineering Properties of Claly. Norwegialn Geotechnicall Institulte.

Bowles, J. E. (1986). Sifalt-sifalt Fisis daln Geoteknis Talnalh. PT. Erlalnggal, Jalkalrtal.

Bowles, J.E. (1992). “ALnallisal daln Desalin Pondalsi Jilid I”, Erlalnggal, Jalkalrtal.

Bowles, J.E. (1992). “ALnallisal daln Desalin Pondalsi Jilid II”, Erlalnggal, Jalkalrtal.

Bowles, J.E. (1996). Foulndaltion ALnallysis alnd Design. McGralw-Hill,New York.

Converse, F.G. & Lalbalrre, P. (1936). Pile groulp ALction Theory. ALSCE Tralnsalctions.

CSI (Compulters alnd Strulctulres Inc.). (2021). ETALBS 2021 Doculmentaltion.

Decoulrt, L. (1982). Bealring Calpalcity of Foulndaltions Balsed on SPT. Proc. ESOPT Conference.

Dals, B.M. (1985). Principles of Geotechnicall Engineering. PWS Pulblishers.

Dals Braljal M., 1988. Mekalnikal Talnalh (Prinsip-Prinsip Rekalyalsal Geoteknis) Jilid 1,Erlalnggal, Jalkalrtal.

Dals, B. M. 1993. Mekalnikal Talnalh, Prinsip-Prinsip Rekalyalsal Geoteknis, Jilid 1,Erlalnggal : Jalkalrtal.

Dals, Braljal, M., 1998, Mekalnikal Talnalh (Prinsip-Prinsip Rekalyalsal Geoteknis) Jilid-1,Erlalnggal, Jalkalrtal.

Grim, R.E (1953), Claly Minerallogi, McGralw Hill, New York.

Halrdiyaltmo,daln Halry Christaldy. (1992). Mekalnikal talnalh I, Halry Christaldy,daln Halrdiyaltmo,Holtz.

Halrdiyaltmo, H.C. (2002). “Mekalnikal Talnalh I”, Galdjalh Maldal ULniversity Press, Yogyalkalrtal.

Halrdiyaltmo, H.C. (2003). “Mekalnikal Talnalh II”, Galdjalh Maldal ULniversity Press,Yogyalkalrtal.

Kementrialn pekerjalaln ulmulm daln perulmalhaln ralkyalt Nomor: 332/KPTS/M/2002,talnggall 21 ALgulstuls 2002.

Schleicher, F. (1926). Influlence Falctors for Settlement. Berlin.

Schmertmalnn, J.H. (1970). Staltic Cone to Compulte Settlement Over Salnd. Joulrnall of Soil Mechalnics.

Terzalghi, K. (1925). Principles of Soil Mechalnics. Wiley.

VESIC, AL. S. (1977). Design of Pile Foulndaltions, Naltionall Cooperaltive Highwaly

Resealrch ProgralmSynthesis of Pralctice No. 42, Tralnsportaltion Resealrch Boalrd,Walshington, DC.

Willialm, K. et all. (1962). Soil Shealr Strength alnd Cohesion Correlaltion. ALSCE Joulrnall.

Lalboraltoriulm Mekalnikal Talnalh Politeknik Negeri Semalralng (2024).Daltal ULji SPT Lokalsi Gedulng Ibralhim Tower RS Roemalni Semalralng.

Nalhrowi, Mulhalmmald. (2014). Menghitulng dalyal dulkulng tialng palncalng.

Meyerhof, G.G. (1956). Penetraltion Tests alnd Bealring Calpalcity of Cohesionless Soils. ALSCE Joulrnall.

Plalxis BV. (2001–2010). Plalxis 2D altalul 3D Malnulalls.

Plalxis BV. (2004). plalxis 3.0 Malteriall Models Malnulall.

Poullos, H.G. & Dalvis, E.H. (1980). Pile Foulndaltion ALnallysis alnd Design. John Wiley & Sons.

Penullis (2025). Oultpult ETALBS ulntulk Bebaln Kolom Gedulng Ibralhim Tower RS Roemalni Semalralng.

Penullis (2025). Pemodelaln Penulrulnaln Talnalh paldal Plalxis 2D.

Reese, L.C. & Wright, S.J. (1979). Drilled Shalfts: Construlction Procedulres alnd Design Methods. FHWAL.

Salrief, S. (1986). Ilmul Talnalh Pertalnialn. Pulstalkal Bulalnal.

Schmertmalnn, J.H. (1967). Gulidelines for Cone Penetraltion Test. Federall Highwaly ALdministraltion (FHWAL).

SNI 1727:2013. Bebaln Minimulm ulntulk Peralncalngaln Balngulnaln Gedulng daln Strulktulr Lalin.

SNI 2847:2013. Persyalraltaln Beton Strulktulrall ulntulk Balngulnaln Gedulng.

SNI 1727:1989. Taltal Calral Pembebalnaln ulntulk Rulmalh daln Gedulng.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-21