Konstruksi Wacana Pancasila pada Konten Instagram BPIP: Analisis Wacana Kritis Norman Fairclough

Authors

  • Muhammad Khatam Muyassar Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
  • Rafif Anggaraksa Rusvi Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
  • Pirgi Pirmansyah Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
  • Ihksan Ahmad Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61722/jssr.v4i6.13181

Keywords:

Pancasila, BPIP, Instagram, analisis wacana kritis, Fairclough

Abstract

Penelitian ini menjelaskan cara akun Instagram resmi BPIP (@bpipri) mengonstruksi wacana Pancasila. Peneliti memakai pendekatan kualitatif dan analisis wacana kritis Fairclough (teks, praktik wacana, praktik sosial-budaya) untuk menganalisis enam unggahan periode 28 September–20 Oktober 2026 beserta komentarnya. Peneliti memilih unggahan dengan convenience sampling. Lima dari enam unggahan menyebut Pancasila atau nama sila langsung dan mengaitkannya dengan topik keseharian. Pola “bukan sekadar X, melainkan Y” (potensi alat bantu tulis) muncul di lima unggahan dan memperluas topik menjadi nilai bersama. Bahasa percakapan membuat standar normatif terdengar sebagai ajakan. Audiens merespons sedikit: rata-rata 82,8 like dan 1,5 komentar per unggahan, dan emotikon mendominasi komentar. Temuan menggambarkan cara BPIP mengonstruksi wacana dalam unggahan yang dianalisis. Temuan tidak menunjukkan bagaimana audiens menerimanya.

References

adefemiogundimu. (2019). Conversationalisation / Language. In Discourse Analysis.

Badan Pembinaan Ideologi Pancasila. (2021). {BPIP} Optimalkan Pembinaan Ideologi Pancasila melalui Media Sosial. bpip.go.id.

Drexler, E. (2022). Impunity and Transitional Justice in Indonesia: Aksi Kamisan’s Circular Time. International Journal of Transitional Justice. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijac010

Entman, R. (2006). Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43, 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x

Etikan, I., Musa, S., & Alkassim, R. (2016). Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5, 1. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11

Faigley, L., Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2002). Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. College Composition and Communication, 54, 318. https://doi.org/10.2307/1512155

Frawley, W. (1993). Norman Fairclough, Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity, 1992. Pp. vii + 259. Language in Society, 22(3), 421–424. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/S0047404500017309

Golafshani, N. (2003). Understanding Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research. The Qualitative Report, 8, 597–607. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2003.1870

Hakim, B., & Rabeh, Z. (2026). Ethics of scientific research in the digital environment. Journal of Awareness. https://doi.org/10.26809/joa.3206

Kim, M. S. (2024). Agonizing Pancasila : Indonesia’s state ideology and post-foundational political thought. Journal of Political Ideologies, 31, 578–600. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2024.2408230

Mansi, L. (2018). FUNGSI DAN PERAN TRADISI MAPALUS DALAM MASYARAKAT MINAHASA, SULAWESI UTARA. 13, 73–84. https://doi.org/10.31969/alq.v13i2.565

Mullet, D. (2018). A General Critical Discourse Analysis Framework for Educational Research. Journal of Advanced Academics, 29, 116–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202x18758260

Mustapa, H., Zulkarnaen, N., & Yuniarti, P. (2024). SACRALIZATION OF PANCASILA: IDEOLOGY AND REPRESSION IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PANCASILA IDEOLOGY DEVELOPMENT BOARD (BPIP) AND GUIDELINES FOR THE APPRECIATION AND PRACTICE OF PANCASILA (P4). Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review, 9, 52–67. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpi.v9i1.3466

Nabila, L. N., Utama, F. P., Habibi, A. A., & Hidayah, I. (2023). Aksentuasi Literasi pada Gen-Z untuk Menyiapkan Generasi Progresif Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Education Research, 4(1), 28–36.

Pesurnay, A. (2018). Pancasila Ideology as a Field of Interpretation. 1, 17. https://doi.org/10.29037/digitalpress.41322

Prayoga, A., Mayasari, M., & Lubis, F. (2020). SARA’S REPRESENTATION IN DETIK.COM NEWS PORTAL (Norman Fairclough’s Critical Discourse Analysis Statement by the Head of BPIP Calling Religion to be the Greatest Enemy of Pancasila). 14. https://doi.org/10.30813/s:jk.v14i2.2234

Republik Indonesia. (2018). Peraturan Presiden Nomor 7 Tahun 2018 tentang Badan Pembinaan Ideologi Pancasila. peraturan.bpk.go.id.

Schrøder, Kim Christian. (1998). Book reviews : Norman Fairclough, Media Discourse. London: Edward Arnold, 1995. 214 pp. ISBN 0-340-63222-4 (hbk); ISBN 0-340-58889-6 (pbk. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 1(2), 285–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/136754949800100209

Simpson, P., Mayr, A., & Statham, S. (2018). Critical Linguistics and Critical Discourse Analysis. Language and Power. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429468896-13

Siregar, H. (2022). Analisis Pemanfaatan Media Sosial Sebagai Sarana Sosialisasi Pancasila. Pancasila: Jurnal Keindonesiaan, 71–82. https://doi.org/10.52738/pjk.v2i1.102

Downloads

Published

2026-10-22