ANGGARAN DASAR YANG TIDAK SESUAI DENGAN PASAL 157 AYAT (4) UNDANG-UNDANG NO. 40 TAHUN TENTANG PRSEROAN TERBATAS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61722/jssr.v1i1.408Keywords:
Articles of Association, Limited Liability Companies.Abstract
In implementing national economic development, society is the main actor, and the Government is obliged to direct, guide and create a supportive atmosphere. Limited Liability Company, hereinafter referred to as Persero, is a legal entity in the form of a capital partnership, which is established based on an agreement, carrying out business activities with authorized capital which is entirely divided into shares. The articles of association serve as guidelines for running a company. Limited liability companies must determine their articles of association in accordance with UUPT 40/2007 so as not to cause problems for interested parties. Problem Formulation 1. What are the legal consequences for Limited Liability Companies whose articles of association do not comply with UUPT 40/2007? 2. Who is meant by an interested party in the explanation of article 157 paragraph (4)? The purpose of this research is to find out what legal consequences will arise if it is not in accordance with the PT's articles of association based on the PT UUPT and to find out who is meant by interested parties in the explanation of article 157 paragraph (4). In this journal, normative legal research methods are used with the scope of the articles of association of a company. The final result of this journal is the legal consequences if the articles of association are not in accordance with UUPT 40/2007, namely that all legal actions carried out by the PT are considered invalid because they contain formal defects, namely they are not in accordance with applicable law and can be dissolved. The parties interested in the explanation of article 157 paragraph (4) are Notaries, Shareholders, Prosecutors, Bank.
References
Buku
Harjono, Dhaniswara K, 2008, “Pembaharuan Hukum Perseroan Terbatas, Tinjauan Terhadap Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 Tentang Perseroan Terbatas”, PPHBI, Jakarta.
Kansil C.S.T, Christine S.T.1996.”Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perseroan Terbatas”, PT Midas Surya Grafindo. Jakarta.
Ray IG, 2009, “Hukum Perusahaan”, Megapoin, Jakarta.
Soerjono Soekanto, Sri Mamuji, 2008, “Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat”, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.
Widjaja Gunawan, 2004, ”Seri Aspek Hukum dalam Bisnis”, Preneda Media, Jakarta.
Jurnal Ilmiah
Adhany Sumardi Vinesha, 2013, “Tanggung Jawab Direksi Setelah Terjadi Perubahan Anggaran Dasar Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 Tentang Perseroan Terbatas”, Diploma Thesis, Universitas Andalas.
Damanik Gunawan, Jamilah Hidayani, 2018, “Pelaksanaan Atas Perubahan Nama Perseroan Terbatas Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007” Repository Universitas Medan Area, Mei.
Harahap, Reyza Pahlevi, 2014, “Kewenangan Notaris Dalam Anggaran Dasar Perseroan Terbatas” Repository Universitas Medan Area, Juni.
I Made Angga Kretanjala, A.A Ketut Sukranata, 2019, “Akibat Hukum Dari Peraturan Perubahan Modal Dasar Perseroan Terbatas Terhadap Pendirian Perseroan Terbatas Oleh Usaha Mikro, Kecil, Dan Menengah”, Kertha Semaya, Denpasar, Januari.
I Gusti Ngurah Agung Kiwerdiguna, I Gusti Agung Ayu Dike Widhiyaastuti, 2019, “Status Badan Hukum Perseroan Akibat Dari Pembubaran Perseroan”, Kertha Semaya, Denpasar, November.
Wiwik Yulianti, 2016, “Akibat Hukum Terhadap Perseroan Terbatas Yang Tidak Melakukan Penyesuaian Anggaran Dasar Dengan Ketentuan Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 Tentang Perseroan Terbatas”, Thesis, Repository Universitas Airlangga, Juli
Peraturan Perundang-Undangan
Indonesia, Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 Tentang Perseroan Terbatas.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 JOURNAL SAINS STUDENT RESEARCH
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
