Penyelesaian Sengketa Dan Akibat Hukum Orientasi Seksual Berbeda Dalam Perkawinan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61722/jssr.v3i4.5236Keywords:
Dispute Resolution; Legal Consequences; Sexual Orientation; Islamic Law; Marriage LawAbstract
Conflicts and divorce in a household are sometimes triggered by differences in sexual orientation, although this issue has not been widely discussed in detail from the perspective of Islamic law or Indonesian positive law. This article aims to examine the dispute resolution mechanisms and legal consequences that arise due to differing sexual orientations in marriage, from the perspectives of Islamic law and Indonesian marriage law. This study uses a normative legal method with a statute and conceptual approach. Data were drawn from primary and secondary legal sources and analyzed qualitatively. The findings indicate that under Islamic law, disputes may be resolved through mediation, conditional divorce (ta’liq talak), or annulment (fasakh). In contrast, Indonesian law allows divorce on grounds of disharmony, though it lacks explicit regulation on sexual orientation. Legal consequences include marital status, child custody, alimony, and division of property. Although not clearly regulated, interpretive flexibility enables judges to issue decisions based on justice and the best interests of the child.
References
Abdullah, Boedi. “Hukum Wakaf Benda Bergerak (Uang) Menurut Fatwa Ulama dan Undang-Undang Nomor 41 Tahun 2014 Tentang Wakaf.” Asy-Syari‘ah 20, No. 1 (Agustus 2018): 1–14.
Adellia Putri Octatiana. “Orientasi Seks yang Berbeda dalam Kasus Perceraian (Analisis Putusan Nomor 4083/Pdt.G/2019/PA.JT).” Skripsi, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, 2020.
Al-Ghazali. Ihya’ ‘Ulum al-Din. Beirut: Dar Ihya al-Turath al-Arabi, t.t.
American Psychological Association. Guidelines for Psychological Practice with Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Clients. Washington, DC: APA, 2012.
Diamond, Lisa M. Sexual Fluidity: Understanding Women’s Love and Desire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2008.
Hidayat, Muh. Adistira Maulidi, Muhammad Fadil Dzikru, dan Magfira Aulia Zahra. “Perbedaan Orientasi Seksual Sebagai Alasan Pembatalan Perkawinan Perspektif Hukum Positif.” Al-Hikam: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga 16, No. 2 (Desember 2024).
Imam al-Syafi’i. Al-Umm. Beirut: Dar Ihya al-Turath al-Arabi, t.t.
Jasser Auda, Maqasid al-Shariah as Philosophy of Islamic Law: A Systems Approach, London: The International Institute of Islamic Thought, 2008.
Kompilasi Hukum Islam (KHI).
Nianti, Nira, dan Nugraha Andri Afriza. “Cover Up Marriage LGBTQ+ Perspektif Al-Qur’an dan Hukum Keluarga Islam.” JISLAW: Journal of Islamic Family Law 2, No. 1 (2022).
Satjipto Rahardjo, Ilmu Hukum, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2000.
Soekanto, Soerjono. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia Press, 1983.
Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan RND. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2016.
Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan.
Wahbah al-Zuhayli. al-Fiqh al-Islami wa Adillatuhu. Juz I. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, 2002.
Yusuf, Abu. Al-Mabsuth. Beirut: Dar Ihya al-Turath al-Arabi, t.t.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 JOURNAL SAINS STUDENT RESEARCH

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.