Merawat Nasionalisme dan Memperkuat Persatuan Generasi Muda melalui Focus Group Discussion: Penguatan Literasi Kebangsaan dan Sikap Anti-Anarkisme di Kota Makassar

Authors

  • Irfan B Universitas Negeri Makassar
  • Andi Rahmat Nizar Hidayat Universitas Negeri Makassar
  • Misbahuddin Misbahuddin Universitas Negeri Makassar
  • Muh. Syilfa Nooviar Universitas Negeri Makassar
  • Muhammad Hidayat. L Universitas Negeri Makassar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61722/japm.v4i6.13296

Keywords:

anti-anarchism; civic literacy; focus group discussion; nationalism; youth

Abstract

Young people in Makassar City face a flow of disinformation and provocation in digital spaces, while the city also carries the experience of demonstrations that ended in the destruction of public facilities. This community engagement program aimed to strengthen civic literacy and anti-anarchist attitudes among young people through a Focus Group Discussion (FGD). The activity was held with SERUM Institute as a partner on 28 August 2026 and involved twenty young people and university students from youth organizations, student bodies, and cross-campus communities. The FGD followed five stages: problem identification, delivery of material, guided discussion, reflection, and formulation of commitments. Data were collected through participant observation, facilitator notes, and documentation, and were analyzed thematically. The results show three abilities observed during the forum: participants recognized the features of information that deserves doubt, formulated three markers of healthy criticism, and drafted eight joint commitments through deliberation. Participants also understood nationalism as an active civic practice rather than mere respect for state symbols. The activity did not use a pre-test and post-test, so these achievements are read as evidence of process and forum outputs, not yet as a measure of increased competence. Post-activity monitoring of the commitments and a measured evaluation in a follow-up forum have been designed to address this limitation. The FGD deserves to be developed as a sustainable means of democratic education for youth organizations and universities.

References

Anderson, B. (2006). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism (Rev. ed.). London: Verso.

Bacaonline.id. (2026, August 28). Dialog SERUM Institute: Merawat nasionalisme, jaga persatuan, tolak anarkisme. Retrieved from https://bacaonline.id/daerah/dialog-serum-institute-merawat-nasionalisme-jaga-persatuan-tolak-anarkisme/

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238

Cinelli, M., De Francisci Morales, G., Galeazzi, A., Quattrociocchi, W., & Starnini, M. (2021). The echo chamber effect on social media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(9), e2023301118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2023301118

Fatir, M. D. (2025, August 31). BPBD Makassar: Korban jiwa insiden demonstrasi 4 orang. ANTARA News Jawa Timur. Retrieved from https://jatim.antaranews.com/berita/968537/bpbd-makassar-korban-jiwa-insiden-demonstrasi-4-orang

Firdaus, R., Millu, P. M. G., Fadhillah, P., Ghaisani, A. H., & Attailah, R. Z. (2025). Generation Z, disinformation, and critical digital literacy: Strengthening national identity in the social media era. Media Hukum Indonesia, 4(1), 1037–1041. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18115424

Fishkin, J., Siu, A., Diamond, L., & Bradburn, N. (2021). Is deliberation an antidote to extreme partisan polarization? Reflections on “America in One Room.” American Political Science Review, 115(4), 1464–1481. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055421000642

Gernert, M., Schuber, A. A., & Schaller, A. (2023). Experiences in the application of logic models in the context of workplace health promotion: A focus group discussion. Evaluation and Program Planning, 100, 102347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2023.102347

Kaniah, K., Budihastuti, E., Suharja, A. A., Maemunah, E., Parwati, S. A. P. E., Mulyanah, A., . . . Kusnanto, E. A. (2025). The utilization of social media and the reinforcement of national identity in Generation Z. Southeast Asian Language and Literature Studies, 1(2), 116–122. https://doi.org/10.55981/salls.2024.7077

Kowalski, M. J. (2023). Measuring changes with traditional and retrospective pre-posttest self-report surveys for a brief intervention program. Evaluation and Program Planning, 99, 102323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2023.102323

Luhendra, S. K. I. (2025). Tantangan generasi Z dalam mempertahankan identitas nasional dari fenomena #KaburAjaDulu. Maliki Interdisciplinary Journal, 3(6), 1711–1721.

Ning, X., Liu, Y., Miao, J. L., & Li, W. L. (2024). Enhancing the potentials of the focus group discussion: Engaging frequently neglected but essential situational factors for analyzing data. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 23. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069241306332

Pennycook, G., Epstein, Z., Mosleh, M., Arechar, A. A., Eckles, D., & Rand, D. G. (2021). Shifting attention to accuracy can reduce misinformation online. Nature, 592(7855), 590–595. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03344-2

Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2021). The psychology of fake news. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(5), 388–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2021.02.007

Permana, S. R., Sumaji, F. W., Zulyka, S., & Pondaag, M. (2026). Peran wawasan nusantara dalam menjaga nasionalisme generasi Z di era globalisasi dan media sosial. Civic Edu: Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan, 9(2), 48–53. https://doi.org/10.23969/civicedu.v9i2.50366

Putradipradja, M. S. F., Jatmika, W. A., & Situmeang, S. M. T. (2026). Revitalizing Pancasila values in the digital era in preventing moral decadence of the younger generation. Sortuz: Oñati Journal of Emergent Socio-Legal Studies, 16(1), 40–50. https://doi.org/10.35295/sz.iisl.2405

Shuman, E., Goldenberg, A., Saguy, T., Halperin, E., & van Zomeren, M. (2024). When are social protests effective? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 28(3), 252–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2023.10.003

Suciati, & Putri, D. L. (2026). National identity of Indonesia’s Generation Z in the digital era: A study on mixed methods. International Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering, Management & Applied Science, 15(3), 1147–1168. https://doi.org/10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150300100

Suganda, F. A., Sundawa, D., Budimansyah, D., & Sari, M. (2026). Digital civic engagement: Transforming the model of citizen involvement in the digital democracy era. Jurnal Pendidikan PKN (Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan), 7(1), 25–46. https://doi.org/10.26418/jppkn.v7i1.104394

Udan, U., Fadhillah, D. N., Fauzi, P., Supriyanto, Y., & Fitriyani, N. (2025). Dinamika identitas kebangsaan generasi muda di era digital: Antara budaya lokal dan global. Jurnal PPKn: Penelitian dan Pemikiran Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan, 13(2), 17–26.

Downloads

Published

2026-11-07

Issue

Section

Articles