Reaktualisasi Kearifan Lokal Bugis-Makassar melalui Focus Group Discussion untuk Membangun Budaya Demokrasi Damai di Kota Makassar

Authors

  • Irfan B. Universitas Negeri Makassar
  • Andi Rahmat Nizar Hidayat Universitas Negeri Makassar
  • Misbahuddin Misbahuddin Universitas Negeri Makassar
  • Muh. Syilfa Nooviar Universitas Negeri Makassar
  • Muhammad Hidayat. L Universitas Negeri Makassar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61722/japm.v4i6.13297

Keywords:

Bugis-Makassar local wisdom, focus group discussion, peaceful democratic culture, Sipakatau, tudang sipulung

Abstract

This community engagement program aimed to strengthen understanding of peaceful ways of voicing aspirations and to re-actualize Bugis-Makassar local wisdom as social capital for conflict prevention, following the riots in Makassar City in late August 2025. Together with SERUM Institute, the team held a Focus Group Discussion on 1 December 2025 with twenty-five core participants drawn from university students, academics, security officers, religious leaders, literacy activists, and youth organization leaders. The activity followed four stages: preparation, orientation, participatory discussion guided by seven prompting questions, and reflection with the formulation of recommendations. Facilitator notes, participant observation, and documentation were analyzed thematically, and achievements were mapped at the output and outcome levels using indicators derived from each objective. The outputs were a multi-stakeholder dialogue forum, eight thematic findings, and four recommendations. At the outcome level, participants distinguished legitimate aspirations from destructive acts, identified the non-material losses caused by violence, and interpreted Sipakatau as mutual humanization, Sipakalebbi as mutual respect, and Sipakamase-mase as compassion and empathy. Participants considered tudang sipulung worth re-actualizing as a multi-stakeholder dialogue forum, while flagging the risk that a rigid application of cultural values may turn into a tool for imposing uniformity. Local wisdom can bridge democratic freedom and social responsibility when it is operationalized through education, regular dialogue forums, and the involvement of community leaders.

References

Armin, R. A., Adliyah, N., & Putra, A. A. P. (2025). Sipakatau as a model for conflict resolution in village head elections in Luwu Regency, South Sulawesi. Bilancia: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Syariah dan Hukum, 19(2), 247–286. https://doi.org/10.24239/blc.v19i2.4350

Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238

Cornwall, A. (2008). Unpacking ‘participation’: Models, meanings and practices. Community Development Journal, 43(3), 269–283. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsn010

Diab, A. L., Pabbajah, M., Widyanti, R. N., Muthalib, L. M., & Widyatmoko, W. F. (2022). Accommodation of local wisdom in conflict resolution of Indonesia’s urban society. Cogent Social Sciences, 8(1), 2153413. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2022.2153413

Fatir, M. D. (2025, August 31). BPBD Makassar: Korban jiwa insiden demonstrasi 4 orang. ANTARA News Jawa Timur. Retrieved from https://jatim.antaranews.com/berita/968537/bpbd-makassar-korban-jiwa-insiden-demonstrasi-4-orang

Feinberg, M., Willer, R., & Kovacheff, C. (2020). The activist’s dilemma: Extreme protest actions reduce popular support for social movements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119(5), 1086–1111. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000230

Fishkin, J., Siu, A., Diamond, L., & Bradburn, N. (2021). Is deliberation an antidote to extreme partisan polarization? Reflections on “America in One Room”. American Political Science Review, 115(4), 1464–1481. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055421000642

Garing, J., Firdaus, W., Herianah, H., Ridwan, M., Erniati, E., Budiono, S., & Pariela, T. D. (2023). Identifying and resolving conflicts using local wisdom: A qualitative study. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 23(4), 69–81. https://doi.org/10.36923/jicc.v23i3.156

Gernert, M., Schuber, A. A., & Schaller, A. (2023). Experiences in the application of logic models in the context of workplace health promotion: A focus group discussion. Evaluation and Program Planning, 100, 102347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2023.102347

Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy (W. Rehg, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Hamzah, H., Zubair, A., & Satriadi, S. (2023). The relevance of the Buginese local wisdom values to religious moderation. Al-Qalam, 29(1), 185–197. https://doi.org/10.31969/alq.v29i1.1173

Kowalski, M. J. (2023). Measuring changes with traditional and retrospective pre-posttest self-report surveys for a brief intervention program. Evaluation and Program Planning, 99, 102323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2023.102323

Ning, X., Liu, Y., Miao, J. L., & Li, W. L. (2024). Enhancing the potentials of the focus group discussion: Engaging frequently neglected but essential situational factors for analyzing data. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 23. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069241306332

Nismara, C. A., Jana, D. F. A., Aini, S. N., & Puspitasari, S. (2025). Conflict resolution based on local wisdom in multicultural communities in Indonesia. International Journal of Geography, Social, and Multicultural Education, 3(2), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.26740/ijgsme.v3n2.p27-36

Nuh, M. S. (2016). Tudang Sipulung: A conflict resolution wisdom of Bugis-Makassar community. Hasanuddin Law Review, 1(2), 241–249. https://doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v1i2.308

Nur, R. J., Wildan, D., & Komariah, S. (2023). Kekuatan budaya lokal: Menjelajahi 3S (Sipakatau, Sipakalebbi, dan Sipakainge’) sebagai simbol kearifan lokal. MIMESIS, 4(2), 166–179. https://doi.org/10.12928/mms.v4i2.8105

Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1995.0002

Rahmawati, R., & Eli, E. (2023). Pendidikan karakter berbasis nilai-nilai budaya Bugis “Sipakatau, Sipakalebi, Sipakainge” di komunitas peduli anak jalanan Makassar. Jurnal Pendidikan Karakter, 14(2), 177–186. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpka.v14i2.63715

Riswandi, R. (2024). Sipakalebbi sebagai model komunikasi antarbudaya etnis Bugis dan etnis Konjo di Sulawesi Selatan, Indonesia. Al-Adabiya: Jurnal Kebudayaan dan Keagamaan, 19(2), 175–196. https://doi.org/10.37680/adabiya.v19i2.5650

Salle, Zainuddin, & Wahida. (2026). Tudang Sipulung: A local wisdom-based land dispute resolution mechanism for sustainable development. Indonesian Journal of Environmental Law and Sustainable Development, 5(1), 167–194. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijel.v5i1.29015

Shuman, E., Goldenberg, A., Saguy, T., Halperin, E., & van Zomeren, M. (2024). When are social protests effective? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 28(3), 252–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2023.10.003

Sukriono, D., Sudirman, S., Rapita, D. D., Al Atok, A. R., & Bramantya, A. (2025). Local wisdom as legal dispute settlement: How Indonesia’s communities acknowledge alternative dispute resolution? Legality: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 33(1), 261–285. https://doi.org/10.22219/ljih.v33i1.39958

Wardyah, N. S. (2025, October 1). Makassar doakan korban tragedi 29 Agustus 2025. ANTARA News Megapolitan. Retrieved from https://megapolitan.antaranews.com/berita/445849/makassar-doakan-korban-tragedi-29-agustus-2025

Zubair, A., Hamzah, H., & Satriadi, S. (2022). Living religious moderation within the Sipakatau, Sipakainge’, and Sipakalebbi cultures of the Bugis community. Walisongo: Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan, 30(2), 195–214. https://doi.org/10.21580/ws.30.2.13048

Downloads

Published

2026-11-07

Issue

Section

Articles