Kajian Teoritis Dan Empiris Mengenai Penggunaan Biaya Relevan Dalam Proses Pengambilan Keputusan Manajerial

Authors

  • Indah Simanjuntak Universitas Negeri Medan, Indonesia
  • Nazla Alifia Putri Hadi Universitas Negeri Medan, Indonesia
  • Winona Keysadli

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61722/jaem.v2i4.7368

Keywords:

Relevant Costs; Managerial Decision Making; Analysis.

Abstract

A shortterm decision that demands the use of relevant costs, future costs that differ between alternatives, in order not to be trapped in total costs or sunk costs that can be misleading [1]. Various empirical studies show that relevant costs improve the quality of decisions such as special orders, make-or-buy, and asset replacement; in SMEs, this analysis has been proven to help choose the most cost-effective option, such as at Anna Bakery and UMKM Roti Hangat Keliling which determine special order decisions and oven use based on relevant cost calculations [2]. However, the effectiveness of relevant costs does not only depend on mathematical calculations, but is also influenced by cognitive biases such as framing bias, the quality of management accounting systems, managers' thinking styles, as well as organizational factors and non-financial values, so that its application is a combination of data, context, and decision-maker behavior [4].

References

R. Martini, M. Thoyib, and Yulita, “Penerapan Perhitungan Biaya Relevan dalam Pengambilan Keputusan Pesanan Khusus,” Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Global Masa Kini, vol. 11, no. 01, 2020, [Online]. Available: Artikel 1.pdf

V. A. Singal and N. Gerungai, “Analisis Biaya Diferensial Dalam Pengambilan Keputusan Menerima atau Menolak Pesanan Khusus pada Anna Bakery Manado,” Jurnal LPPM Bidang EkoSosBudKum, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 33–40, 2023, [Online]. Available: Artikel 4.pdf

A. Feranika et al., “Implementasi Pengambilan Keputusan Taktis Melalui Analisis Biaya Relevan (Studi Kasus: Pabrik Rumahan Roti Hangat Keliling),” EKOMA : Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen, Akuntansi, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 273–284, 2024, [Online]. Available: 273-284 (1).pdf

Z. Enslin, J. Hall, and E. du Toit, “The susceptibility of management accountants to framing bias,” Meditari Accountancy Research, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 133–155, 2023, doi: 10.1108/MEDAR-02-2021-1185.

K. Chang, A. A. Lasyoud, and D. Osman, “Management accounting system: Insights from the decision making theories,” Social Sciences and Humanities Open, vol. 8, no. 1, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100529.

P. Trevisan and J. Mouritsen, “Compromises and compromising: Management accounting and decision-making in a creative organisation,” Management Accounting Research, vol. 60, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.mar.2023.100839.

S. N. Syaqinah, H. Hermawan, and D. Retnowati, “Analisis Biaya Diferensial Dalam Pengambilan Keputusan pada CV Dywantara Karyatama,” EMA – Jurnal Ekonomi Manajemen Akuntansi, vol. 7, no. 2, 2022, [Online]. Available: Artikel 2.pdf

M. Alfaried, A. Fauzi, P. Syahirah, E. S. Rahmadiyanti, and S. P. Adjie, “Peran dan Fungsi Biaya Relevan dalam Mengambil Keputusan Pesanan Khusus,” JURNAL JAMAN, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 134–143, 2023, [Online]. Available: Artikel 3.pdf

M. M. Crowdle, O. McDermott, and A. Trubetskaya, “A Benefit Costing Process for Lean Six Sigma Programs,” The TQM Journal, vol. 35, no. 9, pp. 369–387, 2023, doi: 10.1108/TQM-06-2023-0194.

K. Khusna, D. H. Kafi, A. Mirzania, and S. Fauziyyah, “Analisis Biaya Relevan dalam Pengambilan Keputusan (Memproduksi Sendiri atau Membeli dari Luar) – Toko Oleh-Oleh Sari Rasa Jember,” Jurnal Inovasi Bisnis Manajemen dan Akuntansi, vol. 2, no. 2, 2024, [Online]. Available: Artikel 7.pdf

Downloads

Published

2025-12-04

Issue

Section

Articles